Journal of Qualitative Research in Health Sciences

Authors

Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences

Abstract

Introduction: With the expansion of digital technology and learning models such as massive open online courses (MOOCs) and offline programming (OLP), health education system has revolutionized. Due to the unique characteristics of cyberspace, optimal use of this technology should be considered not only in functional levels, but also in policy and management. The aim of this study was to identify key factors affecting the direction and management of higher health education on cyberspace from experts and scholars perspective in Iran.
Method: In order to conduct this qualitative study, we adhered to a thematic content analysis methodology and Braun-Clarke approaches. This study was conducted through purposeful sampling and semi-structured interviews in Iran.
Results: Replacing the smart stewardship as the main theme, and changes in information technology (IT) infrastructure, changes in knowledge management, and networked collaboration as the sub-themes were identified. According to experts’ opinions, higher health education system for use of intelligent technologies should focus on critical components in its strategic planning and consider new solutions.
Conclusion: Our findings will help policymakers and educational managers to improve steer and strategic planning in medical education on cyberspace through considering involved key components, which leads to added value in the health system.

Keywords

1. Tearle P, Davis N, Birbeck N. Six case studies of information technology-assisted teaching and learning in higher education in England. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education. 1998 Mar 1;7(1):51-70. 2. Rachel E, Masters K. e-Learning in medical education: Learning, teaching and assessment. AMEE Guide 32. Part 1; 2008. 3. Masters,k .,R achel E. e-Learning in medical education: Technology, management and design. AMEE Guide 32. Part 2; 2008. 4. Paliwala A. Learning in cyberspace. Journal of information, law and technology (JILT). 2001:01-1. 5. Herschbach DR. Technology as knowledge: Implications for instruction.1995 6. Koepsell DR. The ontology of cyberspace: philosophy, law, and the future of intellectual property. Open Court Publishing; 2003. 7. Folsom T. Defining Cyberspace (Finding Real Virtue in the Place of Virtual Reality). Tulane Journal of Technology & Intellectual Property. 2007;9:75. 8. Cook DA, Levinson AJ, Garside S, Dupras DM, Erwin PJ, Montori VM. Internet-based learning in the health professions: a meta-analysis. Jama. 2008 Sep 10;300(10):1181-96. 9. Wong G, Greenhalgh T, Pawson R. Internet-based medical education: a realist review of what works, for whom and in what circumstances. BMC medical education. 2010 Feb 2;10(1):1. 10. Hollands FM, Tirthali D. MOOCs: Expectations and Reality. Full report. Online Submission. 2014 May. 11. Aboshady O. Massive open online courses and medical education. International Journal of Medical Students. 2014 Aug 4;2(3):142-3. 12. Khan BH. A framework for web-based learning. Web-based training. 2001 Aug 13:75-98. 13. Wang M, Kang M. Cybergogy for engaged learning: A framework for creating learner engagement through information and communication technology. InEngaged learning with emerging technologies 2006 (pp. 225-253). Springer Netherlands. 14. Geser G. Open Educational Practices and Resources. OLCOS Roadmap, 2012. 2007 Jan. 15. Ahmed AA, Zakaria NH, Elmi AH. An Evaluation of Virtual Learning Environment Readiness in Higher Education Institutions (HEIs). Journal of Information Systewms Research and Innovation. 2014. 16. Ellaway RH. Evaluating a virtual learning environment in medical education.2006 17. Borgman CL, Abelson H, Dirks L, Johnson R, Koedinger KR, Linn MC, Lynch CA, Oblinger DG, Pea RD, Salen K, Smith MS. Fostering learning in the networked world: The cyberlearning opportunity and challenge. A 21st century agenda for the National Science Foundation. Report of the NSF task force on cyberlearning. 2008. 18. Borgman CL, editor. Fostering learning in the networked world: The cyberlearning opportunity and challenge. DIANE Publishing; 2011. 19. Omidinia S, Masrom M, Selamat H. Review of E-Learning and ICT Infrastructure in Developing Countries (Case Study of Iran). American Journal of Economics and Business Administration. 2011; (1)3, 120-125. 20. Yaghoubi J, Malekmohammadi I, Iravani H, Attaran M, Gheidi A. Virtual students' perceptions of e-learning in Iran. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology. 2008 Jul 1;7(3). 21. Keramati A, Afshari-Mofrad M, Kamrani A. The role of readiness factors in E-learning outcomes: An empirical study. Computers & Education. 2011 Nov 30;57(3):1919-29. 22. Ahmadi F. The evaluation of a blended e-learning program for nursing and midwifery students in Tehran University of Medical Sciences. Iranian Journal of Medical Education. 2011 Jan 15;10(4):398-409. 23. Hsieh HF, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative health research. 2005 Nov 1;15(9):1277-88. 24. Graneheim UH, Lundman B. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse education today. 2004 Feb 29;24(2):105-12. 25. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology. 2006 Jan 1;3(2):77-101. 26. Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533-544. 27. Ranjbar, H., Haghdoost, A. A., Sslsali, M., KHoshdel, A., Solaimani, M., & Bahrami, N. (2012). Sampling in qualitative research: A Guide for beginning. J Army Univ Med Sci. 2012 October; 10 (3) : 238-250 28. Patton, M. Q.Qualitative research and evaluation methods. (3rd Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2002. 29. Fielding NG. Triangulation and mixed methods designs data integration with new research technologies. Journal of Mixed Methods Research. 2012 Apr 1;6(2):124-36. 30. Razzaghi N, Abdolrahimi M, Salsali M. Memo and memoing in qualitative research: a narrative review. J Qual Res Health Sci 2015; 4(2): 206-17. 31. Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of qualitative research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage; 1990. 32. Aliramezani H, Borhani F, Okhovati M. Experiences of nursing students in terms of internet information literacy training: a qualitative research. J Qual Res Health Sci 2015; 4(1): 22-34. 33. Hoseinzadeh, M., Hasankhani, H., & Rahmani, F. (2015). Ethics in Qualitative Researches: a Concept Analysis using Rodgers’ Evolutionary Method. Medical Ethics, 9(32). 34. Turner III DW. Qualitative interview design: A practical guide for novice investigators. The qualitative report. 2010 May 1;15(3):754. 35. Guba, E. G. & Y. S. Lincoln (1981). Effective evaluation: improving the usefulness of evaluation results through responsive and naturalistic approaches. San Francisco, CA, Jessey- Bass. 36. Nouri, A., & Mehrmohammadi, M. (2012). A Model for Applying Grounded Theory in Educational journal ofCurriculum Studies (J.C.S.) ,6 (23), 8-35 37. Tahani B. Stewardship of National Oral Health system in Iran: Its strengths and weaknesses. Archives of Iranian medicine. 2013 Dec 1;16(12):717. 38. Alvarez-Rosete A, Hawkins B, Parkhurst J. Health system stewardship and evidence informed health policy. London: GRIP-Health Programme, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine. 2013 Apr. 39. Kvavik, R. B., & Voloudakis, J. (2003). Information technology security: Governance, strategy, and practice in higher education. Educause. 40. Al-Mayahi IH, Sa’ad PM. Information security policy development. Journal of Advanced Management Science Vol. 2014 Jun;2(2). 41. Wyatt JC. Management of explicit and tacit knowledge. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine. 2001 Jan;94(1): 42. Jadad AR, Haynes RB, Hunt D, Browman GP. The Internet and evidence-based decision-making: a needed synergy for efficient knowledge management in health care. Canadian Medical Association Journal. 2000 Feb 8;162(3):362-5. 43. Jones ER. Implications of SCORM™ and emerging e-learning standards on engineering education. InProceedings of the 2002 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference 2002 Mar 20 (pp. 20-22). 44. Qu C, Nejdl W. Towards interoperability and reusability of learning resources: A SCORM-conformant courseware for computer science education. InProc. of the 2nd IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (IEEE ICALT 2002), Kazan, Tatarstan, Russia 2002 Sep 9. 45. Stiller E, LeBlanc C. From computer literacy to cyber-literacy. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges. 2006 Jun 1;21(6):4-13. 46. Gurak LJ. Cyber literacy: Navigating the Internet with awareness Yale University Press New Haven, CT, USA; 2003 Sep 1 47. Bang H, Esmark A. Good governance in network society: Reconfiguring the political from politics to policy. Administrative Theory & Praxis. 2009 Mar 1;31(1):7-37. 48. Aguilera RV, Cuervo-Cazurra A. Codes of good governance worldwide: what is the trigger?. Organization Studies. 2004 Mar 1;25(3):415-43. 49. Misuraca G, Alfano G, Viscusi G. Interoperability challenges for ICT-enabled governance: towards a pan-European conceptual framework. Journal of theoretical and applied electronic commerce research. 2011 Apr;6(1):95-111.