Journal of Qualitative Research in Health Sciences

Authors

1 Ph.D Candidate, Department of Sociology, School of Social Sciences, Islamic Azad University Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Sociology, School of Social Sciences, Islamic Azad University Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Introduction: The weakness of the culture of work and the tendency of people in the society to work poorly and inadequate performance of their duties and responsibilities is one of the problems of human societies.  The present study examined the life span experiences of individuals in this field.
Methods: This study was performed qualitatively, using phenomenological methods. Participates were selected from the staff and managers of Arak city governmental agencies and organizations. 42 participants were selected by purposeful sampling. The method of data collection was semi-structured interview which was recorded and rewritten with the consent of the participants and was analyzed by colazzi method.
Results: Data analysis resulted in the extraction of six main categories and several subcategories. The main categories included lack of organizational justice, change of intrinsic values of work, weakness of personality system, Weakness motivational system, Weakness socialization and poor growth of spirit of intellect.
Conclusion: The present study, by describing the weakness of the culture of work, provided a new understanding of individuals’ experiences of this phenomenon. It also links the origins of such an event to the individual factors in addition to structural factors, which are mutually interconnected.
Therefore, it is suggested that in order to change the culture of work and to achieve an excellent and progressive culture of work, at the same time, it is necessary to modify both middle-level and large-scale community structures and mechanisms, as well as to reinforce, educate, and change its individual and personal contexts.

Keywords

  1. Scott KD, Taylor GS. An examination of conflicting findings on the relationship between job satisfaction and absentism: A meta- analysis. The Academy of Management Journal 1985; 28(3): 599-612. https://doi.org/10.5465/256116 [DOI:10.2307/256116]
  2. Brown D, Melian V, Solow M, Chheng S, Parker K. Culture and engagement. [cited 2019 Nov 17] Available from: https://www2.deloitte.com/us/en/insights/focus/human-capital-trends/2015/employee-engagement-culture-human-capital-trends-2015.html.
  3. Moeidfar S. Work ethics among state office employees of the tehran provincial administration. Social Welfare Quarterly 2007; 6(23): 321-44. [In Persian].
  4. Javadi Yeganeh M, Fooladian M. Social laziness and its effective factors. Iranian Sociological Association 2012; 12(4): 98-125. [In Persian].
  5. Furnell S, Clarke N. Organisational security culture: Embedding security awareness, education and training. [cited 2019 Oct 12] Available from: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.678.9294.
  6. Torraco RJ. Human resource development transcends disciplinary boundaries. Human Resource Development Review 2005; 4(3): 251-3. [DOI:10.1177/1534484305278894]
  7. Maseko TS. Strong vs. Weak organizational culture: assessing the impact on employee motivation. [cited Oct 2019 25] Available from: https://www.hilarispublisher.com/abstract/strong-vs-weak-organizational-culture-assessing-the-impact-on-employeemotivation-21128.html.
  8. Kargas AD, Varoutas D. On the relation between organizational culture and leadership: An empirical analysis. Cogent Business & Management 2015; 2(1): 1055953. [DOI:10.1080/23311975.2015.1055953]
  9. Krejcie RV, Morgan DW. Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement 1970; 30(3): 607-10. [DOI:10.1177/001316447003000308]
  10. Creswell JW. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. 3rd ed. USA: SAGE Publications; 2013.
  11. Patton MQ. Qualitative Research & Eval Methods. 4th ed. USA: SAGE Publications; 2015.
  12. Zahirinya M, Nikkhah H, Behroziyan B. The study of work culture and its effective factors on the employees of Borujerd University Universities. Quarterly Journal of Social-Cultural Development Studies 2016; 4(4): 123-44. [In Persian].
  13. Colquitt JA, Conlon DE, Wesson MJ, Porter C, Ng KY. Justice at the millennium: A meta review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology 2001; 86(3): 425-45. [DOI:10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.425] [PMID]
  14. Adams JS. Inequity in social exchange. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 1965; 2: 267-99. [DOI:10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60108-2]
  15. Körner M, Wirtz MA, Bengel J, Göritz AS. Relationship of organizational culture, teamwork and job satisfaction in interprofessional teams. BMC Health 16. Ambrose ML. Contemporary justice research: A Serv Res 2015; 15:243. [DOI:10.1186/s12913-015-0888-y] [PMID]
  16. new look at familiar questions. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 2002; 89(1): 803-12. [DOI:10.1016/S0749-5978(02)00030-4]
  17. Pink Elephant. The impact of organizational change management on change initiatives. [cited 2019 Oct 17] Available from: https://www1.pinkelephant.com/PinkLINK/na/issue193/The-Impact-Of-Organizational-Change- Management-On-Change-Initiatives.pdf.
  18. Bogt TT, Raaijmakers Q, Wel FV. Socialization and development of the work ethic among adolescents and young adults. Journal of Vocational Behavior 2005; 66(3): 420-37. [DOI:10.1016/j.jvb.2003.12.003]
  19. Nadiri H, Tanova C. An investigation of the role of justice in turnover intentions, job satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behavior in hospitality industry. International Journal of Hospitality Management 2010; 29(1): 41-33. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijhm.2009.05.001]
  20. Little D. Varieties of Social Explanation: an Introduction to the Philosophy of Social Science. USA: Westview Press; 1991.