Authors
Abstract
Introduction: Active aging is an important concept in the positive paradigm of aging that has attracted policy makers’ attention in the past two decades. However, active aging has been less underscored as an issue of research which can provide real and reliable insight about the aging population. Thus, the present study explored the nature, context, and influencing factors of active aging based on the experiences of the elderly.
Method: This qualitative study was conducted through grounded theory method in 2014-2015. Sampling was initiated with purposeful sampling method and continued with theoretical sampling method. The study environment consisted of cultural centers, artistic-cultural associations, and parks in Tehran, Iran. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with 35 elderly adults until data saturation was achieved. Data were analyzed and coded through 3 phases of open, axial, and selective coding suggested by Strauss and Corbin.
Results: “Reduction of roles” was the context for the phenomenon or main theme of the study which manifested as “agency-oriented existentialism”. This theme consisted of two sub-categories of “continuity of self” and “effective identity seeking” and wasthe main essence of experiences of active elderly. Causal conditions for active aging consisted of the subcategories of “internalized health tendency”, “quality of life time perception”, and “rethinking the quality of presence in relationships”.
Conclusion: At first glance, active aging appears as a behavior type, but in fact it is an attempt for agency-oriented existentialism and it requires elderly individuals’ different perception about time, their presence, and health tendency.
Keywords
1. Vallin J. The end of the demographic transition: Relief or concern? Popul Dev Rev 2002; 28(1): 105-20.
2. World Health Organization. World health statistics 2013. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 2013.
3. Sullivan MP, Crampton A. Population aging and social work practice with older adults: Demographic and policy challenges. Int Soc Work 2011; 54(3): 313-29.
4. Statistical Center of Iran, Deputy of Planning and Strategic Supervision. Technical report of 2011 National Census of Population and Housing. Tehran, Iran: Statistical Center of Iran; 2012. [In Persian].
5. Mirzaei M, Shams Ghahfarokhi M. Demography of Elder Population in Iran Over the Period 1956 To 2006. Salmand Iran J Ageing 2007; 2(5): 326-31. [In Persian].
6. Estes CL, Binney EA. The biomedicalization of aging: dangers and dilemmas. Gerontologist 1989; 29(5): 587-96.
7. Oghene OP. Understanding the meanings created around the aging body and sports by masters athletes through media data [MSc Thesis]. Sudbury, ON: Laurentian University of Sudbury; 2013.
8. van Dyk S, Turner M. Active, productive and healthy aging in Germany and the United States. AARP International [Online]. [cited 2011]; Available from: URL:
http://journal.aarpinternational.org/File%20Library/Journals/AARPTheJournal_Winter2011.pdf
9. Fernandez-Ballesteros R, Robine JM, Walker A, Kalache A. Active aging: a global goal. Curr Gerontol Geriatr Res 2013; 2013: 298012.
10. Rowe JW, Kahn RL. Successful aging. Gerontologist 1997; 37(4): 433-40.
11. Jhala N, Christian A. Active aging. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention 2013; 2(1): 1-4.
12. De Donder L, Dury S, De Witte N, Smetcoren AS, Buffel T, Verte D. Active ageing: exploring social participation in Belgium participation rates, individual profiles of participants and thresholds to participate. Proceedings of the 21st Nordic Congress of Gerontology: Dilemmas in Aging Societies; 2012 Jun 10-12; Copenhagen, Denmark. p. 87.
13. Hirai H, Kondo K, Kawachi I. Social determinants of active aging: Differences in mortality and the loss of healthy life between different income levels among older Japanese in the AGES Cohort Study. Curr Gerontol Geriatr Res 2012; 2012: 701583.
14. Buys L, Miller E. The meaning of "active ageing" to older Australians: Exploring the relative importance of health, participation and security. Proceedings of the 39th Australian Association of Gerontology Conference; 2006 Nov 22-24; Sydney, Australia.
15. Paul C, Ribeiro O, Teixeira L. Active ageing: An empirical approach to the WHO model. Curr Gerontol Geriatr Res 2012; 2012: 382972.
16. United Nations Economic Commission for Europe. Introducing the active aging index: Policy in brief [Online]. [cited 2013 Apr]; Available from: URL:
http://www1.unece.org/stat/platform/download/attachments/76287837/activeageingindex.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1366286568393
17. World Health Organization. Active aging: a policy framework. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 2002.
18. Katz S. Busy Bodies: Activity, aging, and the management of everyday life. J Aging Stud 2000; 14(2): 135-52.
19. Hariri N. Principles and methods of qualitative research. Tehran, Iran: Islamic Azad University Press, Tehran Science and Research Branch Press; 2006. [In Persian].
20. Mohammad Pour A. Against Method: Rationale and design of qualitative methodology. Tehran, Iran: Jamee-Shenasan Publications; 2010. [In Persian].
21. Corbin J, Strauss AL. Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications; 2006.
22. Delavar A. Research methods in psychology and education. Tehran, Iran: Virayesh Publications; 2009. [In Persian].
23. Dahlgren L, Emmelin M, Winkvist A. Qualitative methodology for international public health. Umea, Sweden: Epidemiology and Public Health Sciences, Umea University; 2007.
24. Kahana, E, Kahana, B. Conceptual and empirical advances in understanding aging well through proactive adaptation. In: Bengtson V, editor. Adulthood and aging: Research on continuities and discontinuities. New York, NY: Springer; 1996. p. 18-40.
25. Jolanki OH. Agency in talk about old age and health. J Aging Stud 2009; 23(4): 215-26.
26. Tulle E. Rethinking agency in later life. In: Tulle E, editor. Old age andagency. New York, NY: Nova Science Publishers; 2004. p. 175-89.
27. Hockey J, James A. Social identities across the life course. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan; 2002.
28. Morgan LA, Eckert JK, Piggee T, Frankowski AC. Two lives in transition: Agency and context for assisted living residents. J Aging Stud 2006; 20(2): 123-32.
29. Kaufman SR. The ageless self: Sources of meaning in late life. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press; 1985.
30. Grossman MD, Stewart AL. "You aren't going to get better by just sitting around": physical activity perceptions, motivations, and barriers in adults 75 years of age or older. Am J Geriatr Cardiol 2003; 12(1): 33-7.
31. Menec VH, Chipperfield JG. Remaining active in later life. The role of locus of control in seniors' leisure activity participation, health, and life satisfaction. J Aging Health 1997; 9(1): 105-25.
32. Wallhagen MI, Strawbridge WJ, Kaplan GA, Cohen RD. Impact of internal health locus of control on health outcomes for older men and women: a longitudinal perspective. Gerontologist 1994; 34(3): 299-306.
33. Leinonen R, Heikkinen E, Jylha M. Changes in health, functional performance and activity predict changes in self-rated health: a 10-year follow-up study in older people. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2002; 35(1): 79-92.
34. Greaves CJ, Farbus L. Effects of creative and social activity on the health and well-being of socially isolated older people: outcomes from a multi-method observational study. J R Soc Promot Health 2006; 126(3): 134-42.
35. Vik K, Nygard L, Borell L, Josephsson S. Agency and engagement: older adults' experiences of participation in occupation during home-based rehabilitation. Can J Occup Ther 2008; 75(5): 262-71.
36. Tornstam L. Gerotranscedence: A developmental theory of positive aging. New York, NY: Springer; 2006.
37. Midlarsky E, Kahana E. Altruism in later life. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications; 1994.
38. Erikson EH, Erikson JM, Kivnick H. Vital involvement in old age. New York, NY: W. W. Norton and Company; 1994.
39. Dulin PL, Hill RD. Relationships between altruistic activity and positive and negative affect among low-income older adult service providers. Aging Ment Health 2003; 7(4): 294-9.
40. Gauthier AH, Smeeding TM. Time use at older ages. Res Aging 2003; 25(3): 247-74.
41. Lennings CJ. Optimism, satisfaction and time perspective in the elderly. Int J Aging Hum Dev 2000; 51(3): 167-81.
42. Luth EA. Future time perspective and end-of-life planning in older adults. Res Aging 2016; 38(2): 178-201.
43. Lang FR, Carstensen LL. Time counts: future time perspective, goals, and social relationships. Psychol Aging 2002; 17(1): 125-39.
44. Street DA. Sociological approaches to understanding age and aging. In: Blackburn JA, Dulmus CN, editors. Handbook of gerontology: Evidence-based approaches to theory, practice, and policy. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley; 2007. p. 143-63.
45. Kirkevold M, Moyle W, Wilkinson C, Meyer J, Hauge S. Facing the challenge of adapting to a life 'alone' in old age: the influence of losses. J Adv Nurs 2013; 69(2): 394-403.
)