Journal of Qualitative Research in Health Sciences

Authors

1 - Postdoctoral Researcher, Department of Social Sciences and Humanities, School of Social Welfare, Tokyo Metropolitan University, Tokyo, Japan

2 Professor, Department of Social work, School of Social Sciences, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Introduction: Concerning the professional duties of medical social workers, they can have effective role in the treatment process and solving the problems of clients. This study was performed to investigate the current roles and tasks of social workers in hospitals.
Method: In this qualitative study, 15 social workers of public and specialized hospitals in Tehran were selected using purposeful sampling. Data were collected using in-depth semi-structured interview and analyzed using qualitative content analysis.
Results: To determine the main concepts, after combining some of the codes, they were finally classified into 13 categories and 2 themes (indirect and direct care roles). The indirect care roles were categorized into 4 categories including research in healthcare, cooperation with and membership in the treatment team and hospital committees, documentation, and the provision of financial resources. The direct care roles were categorized into 9 categories, namely, psychosocial and financial support, educator, liaison, service provider, counselor, discharge planning and follow-ups after discharge, assessment and eligibility, crisis intervention, and client and system advocacy.
Conclusion: Most of the roles derived from the analysis of interviews were specialized roles of medical social workers. But the tasks related to the roles showed that most of the tasks defined for the roles are either not professional or clear.

Keywords

1. Abbaszadeh M. Reliability and validity in qualitative research. Journal of Applied Sociology 2013; 23(1): 19-34. [In Persian]. 2. Asquith S, Clark C, Waterhouse L. The Role of the Social Worker in the 21st Century: A Literature Review. Edinburgh: Scottish Executive Education Department; 2005. 3. Auerbach C, Mason SE, Heft Laporte H. Evidence that supports the value of social work in hospitals. Soc Work Health Care 2007; 44(4): 17-32. 4. Beder J. Hospital Social Work: The Interface of Medicine and Caring. UK: Routledge; 2013. 5. Berkman B, Bonander E, Rutchick I, Silverman P, Kemler B, Marcus L, et al. Social work in health care: Directions in practice. Soc Sci Med 1990; 31(1): 19-26. 6. Chitereka C. Hospital social work practice in Zimbabwe. Soc Work Health Care 2010; 49(9): 769-82. 7. Cowles LA, Lefcowitz MJ. Interdisciplinary expectations of the medical social worker in the hospital setting. Health Soc Work 1992; 17(1): 57-65. 8. Delavar A. Qualitative methodology. Rahbord 2010; 19(54): 307-29. [In Persian]. 9. Flick U. An introduction to Qualitative Research. 4th ed. London: Sage; 2010. 10. Gehlert S, Browne T. Handbook of Health Social Work. 2nd ed. USA: John Wiley & Sons; 2011. 11. Graneheim UH, Lundman B. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: Concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today 2004; 24(2): 105-12. 12. Green LW, Glasgow RE. Evaluating the relevance, generalization, and applicability of research: issues in external validation and translation methodology. Eval Health Prof 2006; 29(1): 126-53. 13. Hsieh HF, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res 2005; 15(9): 1277-88. 14. Judd RG, Sheffield S. Hospital social work: Contemporary roles and professional activities. Soc Work Health Care 2010; 49(9): 856-71. 15. Pockett R. Staying in hospital social work. Soc Work Health Care 2002; 36(3): 1-24. 16lturally competent social service. Social Service Review 2007; 81(1): 27-45. 17. Priest J. The Integration of Health and Social Care. London: BMA; 2012. 18. Sadoughi M. Qualitative research evaluation. Journal of Methodology of Social Sciences and Humanities 2008; 14(56): 55-72. [In Persian]. 19. Wong C, Chan B, Tam V. Medical social workers in Hong Kong hospitals: Expectation, authority structure and role ambiguity. International Social Work 2000; 43(4): 495-516.