Journal of Qualitative Research in Health Sciences

Authors

1 Ph.D. Candidate, Psychology Department, School of Literature and Humanities, Islamic Azad University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran

2 Assistant Professor, Psychology Department, Faculty School of Literature and Humanities, Islamic Azad University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran

3 Ph.D. in Sociology

Abstract

Introduction
What is important in educational courses is transferring the information to the workplace. This study was done with the aim of determining effective factors on effective learning in teacher's in-service trainings in the students individual health domain.
Method
This study was done with the use of qualitative approach and the content analysis method in 97. In order to collecting data the semi-structured interview was used. The participants of this study consisted of teacher's in Kerman. According to the data saturation level, 23 of them were selected by using purposeful sampling method. The main question of the interview was effective factors in effective learning teacher's  in-service trainings in the students individual health domain. Qualitative content analysis method was used to analyze the data. The validity of the research findings was guaranteed by the reviewed by members methods and multi-stratified data sources.
Results
The effective factors on effective learning of students individual health domain are placed in three categories, individual factors  ( including efficiency, attitude, person's capacity to learn issues related to the health), institutional factors ( including support and opportunity of theoretical concepts in health domain), and educational factors ( location and time of training related to the individual health, educational equipment, need assessment of health-related content, educational career content, and instructors ability).
Conclusion
Regardless of the attitude, motivation, and efficiency of the participants, pay attention to their readiness to learn, providing necessary support, providing facilities and equipment, and paying attention to the needs of teachers are the most important factors that provides application of lessons learned in the workplace.

Keywords

References 1. Sahinidis A, Bouris J. Employee perceived training effectiveness relationship to employee attitudes. Journal of European Industrial Training 2008;32(1): 63-76. 2. Sanayei, A., Salmanian, H.. Analysis of factors affecting the acceptance of virtual education with emphasis on Internal factors. Educational Technology, 2013; 2(4): 261-270. . [In Persian]. 3. Baridi T. T. Transfer of Training: A Review and Direction for future Research. Personnel psychology 2005; 1: 63-105. Hosseini, K., Nouri, S. H., Zabihi, A. Admission of E-learning in Higher Education: Application of Current Theory, Technology Acceptance Model and Quality of Electronic Services. Quarterly Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education. 2013;19(1): 111-136. 4. Orangi A, Gholtash A, Shahamat N, Yolsiani GH. Investigating the Effect of In-Service Training on Teacher's Professional Performance in Shiraz. Quarterly Journal - A New Approach to Educational Management2011; 2(5): 95- 114. [In Persian]. 5. Yaw, Dorothy Carole. (2008). Tools for transfer, Industrial and Commercial training 40(3), 152-155. 6. Weldy, T. G. (2009). Learning organization and transfer: strategies for improving performance. The Learning Organization, 16(1), 58 – 68. 7. Yazdani S, KHoshgoftar Z, Ahmady , S, Foroutan S A. Learning in Cyberspace: A Thematic Content Analysis in Health Learning System . J Qual Res Health Sci. 2017; 6 (3) :296-309[In Persian] 8. Perez, A. Measuring the perceived transfer of learning and training for a customer service training program delivered by line managers to call center employee in a fortune 200 financial service company[Ph.D. Thesis]. University of North Texas; 2105. 9. Cheng, E.W.L. & Ho, D.C.K. (2014). A review of transfer of training studies in the past decade. Personnel Review, 30(1), pp. 102-118. The current issue and full text archive of this journal is available at http://www.emerald-library.com/ft. 10. Quesada- Pallares C. Training transfer evaluation in the publication administration of Catalonia: The MEVIT factors model. Proscdia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 2012; 46:1751-1755. 11Omidinia S, Masrom M, Selamat H. Review of e-learning and ICT infrastructure in developing countries (Case Study of Iran). American Journal of Economics and Business Administration 2011; 3(1): 120-5. 12. Hosaini Largani S.M, Fathi Vajargah K, Arefi M, Zarafshani k. Conceptualization of Scrap learning and its reduction strategies in Iranian higher education system from the viewpoint of experts. Quarterly Journal of Measuring and Educational Evaluation Studies 2015; 5(9): 9-33 . [In Persian]. 13. Sadeghi A, Anvari S. The role of university and academic research in the development process. Proceedings of the Conference on Higher Education and Sustainable Development 2004;(1): 173- 198 . [In Persian]. 14. Burke, L.A. & Hutchins, H.M. (2007). Training transfer: An Integrative Literature Review. Human Resource Development Review. 6(3), 263-296. 15. Bakhshande H, Ahmadi H, Behnam M, Hamidi M. Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Arbitration Courses and Coaching Courses from Students' Perspectives Based on the Model of Kirk Patrick. Sports Management Journal 2014;5(4): 161-178. [In Persian]. 16. Saeif A. New Psychology: Psychology of Learning and Learning. Tehran, Iran: Nashre Doran; 2017 17. Yozbashi A. Investigating factors affecting the effectiveness of training courses of the National Iranian Oil Company and providing an appropriate educational model [Master Thesis]. Iran, Tehran: Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Tehran; 2010. 18. Park J. H., Wentling T. Factors associated with transfer of training in workplace e- learning. Journal of Workplace Learning 2007; 19(5):311-329. 19. Kontoghiorghes C. A Systemic Perspective of Training Transfer. In: Käthe, S: Transfer of Learning in Organizations. Springer International Publishing 2010; 65-79. 20. Saks A. M. & Belcourt M. An investigation of training activities and transfer of training in organizations. Human Resource Management 2006; 45 (4): 629- 948. 21. Baldwin T. T, Ford K. J. Transfer of training: A review and directions for future research. Personnel Psychology 2011; 41(1): 63-105. 22. Noe R.A. Trainees, attributes and attitudes: Neglected influences on training effectiveness. Academy of management Review 2010; 11(4): 736-749. 23. Olivos P, Santos A, Martin S, Ca as M., G mez- L zaro E, Maya Y. The relationship between learning styles and motivation to transfer of learning in a vocational training program. Suma Psicol gica 2016; 23(1): 25 - 32. 24. Noorizan M. M, Afzan N. F, Akma A. S. The Moderating Effects of Motivation on Work Environment and Training Transfer: A Preliminary Analysis. Procedia Economics and Finance 2016; 37: 158-163. 25. Mattox J. R. Scrap Learning—Your Programs Are Not As Good as You Think They Are. Training Industry Conference & Exposition 2015. 26, Barshan A, Safai Movahed S, Farzad V A, Kiamanesh A, Moghadam Zadeh A. The Effective Factors on the Formation of Scrap Learning in In-Service Training: A qualitative study. J Qual Res Health Sci. 2019; 7 (4) :418-427. [In Persian]