Journal of Qualitative Research in Health Sciences

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 PhD Student in Public Management, Department of Management, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran

2 Associate Professor, Department of Management, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran

3 Professor, Department of Management, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran

4 Professor, Department of Management, Faculty of Management and Accounting, University of Tehran, Farabi College, Qom, Iran

10.34172/jqr.2023.05

Abstract

Background: A nudge can cause favorable behavioral changes in line with organizational goals and even increase productivity, satisfaction with, and trust in healthcare organizations. Nurses must make sound and fast decisions to meet patient needs and perform the necessary interventions as they have limited time to stop and logically analyze what actions they must take. Besides, sometimes people make decisions that are not bad for them, but they need to receive help to make better choices. Hence, nudging strategies can help them to make more effective decisions. To this end, the present study aimed to identify the reasons for using nudges in healthcare organizations.
Methods: Following interpretive philosophy and a qualitative approach, the present study sought to identify the reasons for using nudges. This study was conducted using a grounded theory approach based on Colaizzi’s seven-step data analysis method. The research population included nurses working in private and public hospitals in Kerman. The participants were 15 nurses who were selected through purposive sampling until the data were saturated.
Results: Data analysis showed people tend to use nudges for individual reasons such as minimizing mistakes at work, reducing stress, valuable changes, decreasing the risk of criticism, reducing the halo effect and stereotyping errors, preserving the personality, not losing freedom, cognitive limitations, increasing the probability of accepting the message, and maintaining relationships; managerial reasons such as flexible and gradual nature of nudges, risk management, extra-role behaviors, safety, the elimination of unnecessary formalities, ease of use, cost-effectiveness, and behavior management; and finally organizational reasons such as increasing productivity, creating a favorable climate, promoting a culture of criticism, win-win strategy, increasing trust in the organization, and risk management tools.
Conclusion: The data in this study revealed that staff in healthcare organizations tend to use nudges for individual, managerial, and organizational reasons. An awareness of these reasons helps healthcare organizations to use nudging strategies in emergencies and in a limited period to change employees’ behavior in line with organizational goals and policies.

Highlights

Fatemeh Shamsi (Google Scholar) (PubMed)

Gholamreza Malekzadeh (Google Scholar) (PubMed)

Alireza Khorakian (Google Scholar) (PubMed)

Hasan Zarei Matin (Google Scholar) (PubMed)

Keywords

  1. Kahneman D. Thinking, fast and slow. In: Farrar, Straus and Giroux. American Psychological Association; 2011.
  2. Wilkinson TM. Nudging and manipulation. Polit Stud (Oxf). 2013;61(2):341-55. doi: 1111/j.1467-9248.2012.00974.x.
  3. Doostmohammadi H, Mirzaee A, Safavi M. The study of the relationship between job stress and productivity among nurses in selected hospitals of Islamic Azad University. Medical Science Journal of Islamic Azad Univesity-Tehran Medical Branch. 2018;28(4):325-32. doi: 29252/iau.28.4.325. [Persian].
  4. Mols F, Haslam SA, Jetten J, Steffens NK. Why a nudge is not enough: a social identity critique of governance by stealth. Eur J Polit Res. 2015;54(1):81-98. doi: 1111/1475- 6765.12073.
  5. Thaler, R. H. Behavioral Economics: Past, Present, and Future. American Economic Review. 2016. 106 (7):1577-1600.
  6. Ebert P, Freibichler W. Nudge management: applying behavioural science to increase knowledge worker productivity. J Organ Des. 2017;6(1):4. doi: 1186/s41469- 017-0014-1.
  7. Das J. Nudge Management as an Essential Behavioural Science Application to Improve Performance Management for Higher Productivity: A PSU Perspective. 2018. https://www. abssummit.in/abs-summit2018/pdf/Nudge-Management- Jhilmil-Das.pdf.
  8. Leonard TC. Richard H. Thaler, Cass R. Sunstein, Nudge: improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. Const Political Econ. 2008;19(4):356-60. doi: 1007/ s10602-008-9056-2.
  9. Ghasemi F, Akbari H, Akbari H, Adibzadeh A. Designing and validating a questionnaire for assessing the safety climate among nurses. J Mil Med. 2018;20(5):488-99. [Persian].
  10. Mosadeghrad AM. Relationship between nurses’ knowledge about ergonomy and their job injuries. J Shahrekord Univ Med Sci. 2004;6(3):21-32. [Persian].
  11. Ehsani, H. Nishabur nurse’s death nudge, Mehr news agency, 2015 Jan. Available from URL: http://www/cdc/gov/ncidoc/ EID/eid.htm
  12. Heidari A, Zardosht R. Critically evaluation widely published newspapers in relation to nursing in 1392. Hakim Health Syst Res. 2016;19(1):4-12. [Persian].
  13. Thaler RH, Sunstein CR. Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness. Penguin Books; 2008.
  14. Glaser BG, Holton J. Remodeling grounded theory. Hist Soc Res. 2007(19):47-68.
  15. Lincoln YS, Guba EG. Naturalistic Inquiry. SAGE Publications; 1985.
  16. Kan MM, Parry KW. Identifying paradox: a grounded theory of leadership in overcoming resistance to change. Leadersh Q. 2004;15(4):467-91. doi: 1016/j.leaqua.2004.05.003.
  17. Zarifnejad S, Johansson P. Nudge Management; A Way to Motivate Healthier Behavior. School of Business, Society and Engineering; 2018.
  18. Cai CW. Nudging the financial market? A review of the nudge theory. Account Finance. 2020;60(4):3341-65. doi: 1111/ acfi.12471.
  19. Möllenkamp M, Zeppernick M, Schreyögg J. The effectiveness of nudges in improving the self-management of patients with chronic diseases: a systematic literature review. Health Policy. 2019;123(12):1199-209. doi: 1016/j. healthpol.2019.09.008.
  20. de Haan T, Linde J. Nudge Lullaby. CREED Working Paper. 2011.
  21. Sunstein CR. Nudging: a very short guide. J Consum Policy (Dordr). 2014;37(4):583-8. doi: 1007/s10603-014-9273-1.
  22. Mirzaei V, Rahimnia F, Mortazavi S, Shirazi A. Organizational cynicism of the nurses: a phenomenological study. J Qual Res Health Sci. 2018;7(1):88-102. [Persian].
  23. Alavi A, Bahrami M, Zargham-Boroujeni A. Perceived self-efficacy of care process management among pediatric nurses: a qualitative study. J Qual Res Health Sci. 2016;5(3):283-95. [Persian].
  24. Nikkhah Farkhani Z, Rahimniya F, Kazemi M, Shirazi A. An analysis of nurses ethical behavior toward persons accompanying a patient based on the theory of virtue ethics. J Qual Res Health Sci. 2015;3(4):363-76. [Persian].
  25. Zarrinsadaf N, Yazdanpanah A, Dehnavieh R. Barriers to knowledge sharing among nurses in educational hospitals of Kerman city, Iran. J Qual Res Health Sci. 2020;6(2):181-200. [Persian].
  26. Keshvari M, Shirdel A, Taheri Mirghaedi M, Yusefi AR. Challenges in the optimal management of human resources in hospitals: a qualitative study. J Qual Res Health Sci. 2020;7(4):349-60. [Persian].