Journal of Qualitative Research in Health Sciences

Authors

1 SBMU

2 Tarbiat Modares

Abstract

Introduction: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (2009) reported that since women’s experiences of induced abortion are poorly known, examining the effectiveness of current policies and planning for the future are difficult. Due to illegality of induced abortion in Iran and the significant knowledge gap in this area, the present study was designed. Method: The data were collected through 23 semi-structured in-depth interviews from May to September 2013 in Tabriz, Iran, and analyzed using descriptive-interpretive approach of content analysis. The participants were 15 women who had recently undergone an induced abortion (during the past year). All interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Data analysis was conducted simultaneously to data collection and using MAXQDA 2007. Results: Findings fell into three main themes: individual reflections, gaining social support, and postabortion conflicts. This means that the study participants, when facing an unplanned pregnancy, showed negative reactions and had some concerns. Then, they begin to gain social support for having an abortion. Due to the incompatibleness of abortion with religious beliefs and values, post-abortion conflict was a common experience. Conclusion: Unplanned pregnancy for women begins with initial negative reactions and leads to postabortion conflicts. These findings highlight the importance of psychological support of women with unplanned pregnancies, prevention of unwanted pregnancy occurrence, and designing secondary prevention programs.

Keywords

[1] World Health Organization. Building knowledge base on the social determinants of health: review of 7 countries in EMRO. WHO Regional Publications: Eastern Mediterranean Series 31, 2008 [2] Erfani A., McQuillan K. Rates of induced abortion in Iran: the roles of contraceptive use and religiosity, Studies in Family Planning 2008; 39: 111–22 [3] World Health Organization. Unsafe abortion: Global and regional estimates of the incidence of unsafe abortion and associated mortality, 5th edition, 2007 [4] CDC. Reproductive health of women: Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Retrieved from:www.cdc.gov. June 3, 2009 [5] Thorne S, Kirkham SR, MacDonald-Emes J. Interpretive description: a noncategorical qualitative alternative for developing nursing knowledge. Research in nursing & health 1997; 20: 169-77 [6] Elo S., Kyngas H. The qualitative content analysis process, Journal of Advaned nursing 2008; 62: 107-15 [7] Sandelowski M. Whatever happened to qualitative description? Research in Nursing & Health 2000; 23: 334-40 [8] Mortazavi F., Mottaghi Z., Shariati M., Damghanian M. Women’s experiences of unwanted pregnancy. Journal of Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, 2012; 15: 492-509 [Persian] [9] Peacock NR, Kelley MA, Carpenter C, Davis M, Burnette G, Chavez N. Pregnancy discovery and acceptance among low-income primiparous women: A multi-cultural exploration. Maternal and Child Health Journal 2001; 5: 109-18 [10] Shahbazi S, Fathizadeh N, Taleghani F. The Process of Illegal Abortion: A Qualitative Study. Payesh 2011; 10: 183-95 [Persian] [11] Zamani-Alavijeh F, Noohjah S, Kheiriyat M, Haghighizadeh M.H. Related factors of unwanted pregnancy and intention of women for continuation or termination based on HBM. Payesh 2012; 11: 876-85 [Persian] [12] Greene M, Mehta M, Pulrwitz J, Wulf D, Bankole A, Singh S. Involving men in reproductive health: contributes to development. Background paper to the public choices, private decisions: sexual and reproductive health and the millennium development goals. United Nation Millennium Development project. Retrieved from: RL:http://www.unmillenniumproject.org/documents/Greene_et_al-final.pdf. SEP 5, 2009 [13] Hoogen SR. Contexts of choice: personal constructs of motherhood in women's abortion decisions. ProQuest thesis. Oxford, Ohio: Miami University; 2010 [14] Wilson EK, McQuiston C. Motivations for pregnancy planning among Mexican immigrant women in North Carolina. Maternal and Child Health Journal 2006; 10: 311-20 [15] Miller RS. The social construction and reconstruction of physiological events: Acquiring the pregnancy identity. Stud Symbolic Interaction 1978; 1: 181–204 [16] Tsilo MM. Exploring the psychological sequelae of women who have undergone abortion: A multiple case-study approach: University of Stellenbosch; 2007 [17] Rowlands S, Guthrie K. Abortion and mental health. The British Journal of Psychiatry 2009; 195: 83. [18] Fountain TM. The Effects of Beliefs and Coping on Emotional Response to Surgical Abortion: Walden University; 2007 [19] GE Robinson, NL Stotland, NF Russo, Lang JA, Occhiogrosso M. Is There an “Abortion Trauma Syndrome”? Critiquing the Evidence. Harvard Review of Psychiatry 2009; 17: 268-90. [20] Katrina K, Foster K, Weitz TA. Social Sources of Women’s Emotional Diffi culty After Abortion: Lessons from Women’s Abortion Narratives. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health 2011; 43:103–9 [21] Schaster S. Abortion in moral world of the Cameroon Grassfields. Reproductive Health Matters 2005; 13: 130-38 [22] Rana A, Pradhan N, Gurung G, Singh N. Induced septic abortion: A major factor in maternal mortality and morbidity. Obstetrics & Gynecology Research 2004; 30: 3-8 [23] Porter LC. How women "make sense" of an unwanted pregnancy: A case study of the abortion/live birth paradox in surveillance research. Thesis for PhD degree, Regent University; 2010