Journal of Qualitative Research in Health Sciences

Authors

1 allmeh tabatabaei university

2 atu university

Abstract

Introduction: Increasing divorce rates have important implications for children. The causal relationship between parental divorce and mental health of children is not simple and there are different patterns for the response of children to parental divorce. The examination of gender as a possible mediator in the adaptation of children to divorce has, in some cases, rendered contradictory results. The aim of this study was to identify the psychological reactions of boys to parental divorce in a qualitative study. Method: The present study is qualitative in nature. The study population consisted of boys who had experienced parental divorce in Shahriar County, Iran. Subjects were selected using purposive sampling method. In-depth interviews were conducted with a total of 13 boys of 12-17 years of age from families who had experienced separation 1-5 years prior to the time of the interviews and lived with their mothers. Marshall and Rossman’s reduction and interpretation method was used for data analysis. Data reduction and interpretation method involves the sorting of data into categories and coding them. Results: The 2 main themes of emotional reactions and behavioral reactions were achieved through data analysis. The subcategories of emotional reactions include a sense of relief, sadness, anger, and mixed reaction and the subcategories of behavioral reactions included maturity, academic performance, and behavior problems. Conclusion: This study showed that the processes of divorce and separation are not experienced homogeneously by all children. The effects of divorce can be positive, negative, or a mix of the two. It however seems reasonable for one to conclude that the negative impact of divorce on boys can be extensive. This illustrates children’s different perceptions of divorce and its related processes that lead to the different response patterns in boys to divorce.

Keywords

13 منابع 1 - Etemadi A, Hajihasani M, Nadalipour H, Nazari E. Effect of Gestalt Therapy on self - esteem and anxiety in children of divorce. Journal of Psychology. 2015;18(4): 438 - 452.[ In Persian]. 2 - Hetherington EM, Arasteh JD. Impact of Divorce, Single Parenting and Stepparenting on Children: A Case Study of Visual Agnosia: Psychology Press; 2014. 3 - Amato PR, Kane JB, James S. Reconsidering the “good divorce”. Family Relations. 2011;60(5):511 - 24. 4 - Hetherington EM, Stanley - Hagan M. The adjustment of children with divorced parents: A risk and resiliency perspective. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 1999;40(01):129 - 40. 5 - Hetherington EM, Reiss D, Plomin R. Separate social worlds of siblings: The impact of nonshared environment on development: Routledge ; 2013. 6 - Mott FL, Kowaleski - Jones L, Menaghan EG. Paternal absence and child behavior: Does a child's gender make a difference? Journal of Marriage and the Family. 1997:103 - 18. 7 - Amato PR, Anthony CJ. Estimating the effects of parental divorce and death with fixed effects models. Journal of Marriage and Family. 2014;76(2):370 - 86. 8 - Mucaj A, Xeka S. DIVORCE AND PSYCHO - SOCIAL EFFECTS ON ADOLESCENTS IN ALBANIA. European Scientific Journal. 2015;11(14). 9 - Amato PR, Keith B. Parental divorce and the well - being of child ren: a meta - analysis. Psychological bulletin. 1991;110(1):26. 10 - Allison PD, Furstenberg FF. How marital dissolution affects children: Variations by age and sex. Developmental Psychology. 1989;25(4):540. 11 - Emery RE. Renegotiating family relationships: Divorce, child custody, and mediation: Guilford Press; 2011. 12 - Amato PR, Ochiltree G. Interviewing children about their families: A note on data quality. Journal of Marriage and the Family. 1987:669 - 75 13 - Wallerstein JS, Corbin SB, Lewis JM. Children of divorce: A 10 - ye ar study. 1988. 14 - Wallerstein JS, Blakeslee S. Second chances: Men, women, and children a decade after divorce: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt; 2004. 15 - Coughlin C, Vuchinich S. Family experience in preadolescence and the development of male delinquency. Journal of Marriage and the Family. 1996:491 - 501. 16 - Neuman MG. Helping your kids cope with divorce the sandcastles way: Random House Incorporated; 1999. 17 - Mitchell AK. Children in the middle: Living through divorce: Taylor & Francis; 1985. 18 - Marshall C, Rossman GB. Designi ng qualitative research: Sage publications; 2010. 14 19 - Creswell JW. Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches: Sage; 2012. 20 - Fantuzzo JW, Lindquist CU. The effects of observing conjugal violence on children: A review and analysis of research methodology. Journal of Family Violence. 1989;4(1):77 - 94. 21 - Kitzmann KM, Emery RE. Child and family coping one year after mediated and litigated child custody disputes. Journal of Family Psychology. 1994;8(2):150 22 - Rodgers KB, Rose HA. Risk and resili ency factors among adolescents who experience marital transitions. Journal of Marriage and Family. 2002;64(4):1024 - 37. 23 - Amato PR. The Consequences of Divorce for Adults and Children: An Update. Društvena istraživanja - Časopis za opća društvena pitanja. 2014( 1):5 - 24. 24 - Hansen CB. Jessica Laird, Harvard University:" The Effect of Divorce on Children’s Outcomes"". 2015. 25 - Hanson TL. Does parental conflict explain why divorce is negatively associated with child welfare? Social Forces. 1999;77(4):1283 - 316. 26 - Sirvanli - Ozen D. Impacts of divorce on the behavior and adjustment problems, parenting styles, and attachment styles of children: Literature review including Turkish studies. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage. 2005;42(3 - 4):127 - 51. 27 - Wallerstein JS, Lewis JM , Blakeslee S. The unexpected legacy of divorce: A 25 year landmark study: Hyperion; 2001 28 - Akhondi N. Study of addiction in children of divorce . Journal of Pieke Nour. 2000; 5.1. [ In Persian]. 29 - O'Keefe M. Adjustment of children from maritally violent homes . Families in Society. 1994 30 - Blazsin H, Guldenmund F. The social construction of safety: Comparing three realities. Safety science. 2015;71:16 - 27. 31 - Schwandt TA, Lincoln YS, Guba EG. Judging interpretations: but is it rigorous? trustworthiness and authenticit y in naturalistic evaluation. New directions for evaluation. 2007;2007(114):11 - 25. 32 - Oakes J, Wells AS, Jones M, Datnow A. The social construction of ability, cultural politics, and resistance to reform. History of Multicultural Education Volume 2: Foundatio ns and Stratifications. 2012:293