Author
alame tabatabai
Abstract
Introduction: In the grounded theory research methodology, one of the main concerns of researchers is how and when to use the existing literature. Followers of Glaser believe that, in grounded theory, literature should not be reviewed before the research, because this awareness causes the researcher to unconsciously influence the research. However, the followers of Strauss believe that, in grounded theory, literature review before the beginning of the research is essential.
Method: This study was performed by an extensive review of literature in databases, such as Springer, ProQuest, Oxford Journals, Wiley Online Library, SAGE Publications, Scopus, and ScienceDirect, and also books on qualitative research method.
Results: Literature review in grounded theory can act as an assessment device for an emerging theory and enrich it, does not necessarily need to be considered at the end of the research because it can enhance the inductive research process.
Conclusion: Initial literature review is not the only effective factor on the research process; the researcher's previous experiences and knowledge of the subject can also affect the emerging theory. However, researcher reflexivity, use of short notes during the research, annotation, and writing previous experiences can reduce the impact of the researcher on the study process.
Keywords
1. Glaser, B.G., & Strauss, A. Discovery of grounded theory. Chicago, IL: Aldine.1967.
2. Kennedy T. & Lingard L. Making sense of grounded theory in medical education. Medical Education.2006, 40, 101–108.
3. Payne, S. Grounded theory. In E. Lyons & A. Coyle (Eds.), Analysing qualitative data in psychology (pp. 65–86). London: Sage.2007.
4. christiansen, O. The Literature Review in Classic Grounded Theory Studies: A methodological note. The Grounded Theory Review.2011,10(3),21-25.
5. Hickey G. The use of literature in grounded theory. NT Research.1997, 2, 371–379.
6. Chalmers, A. F. What is this thing called science? (3rd ed.). New York: Open University Press.1999.
7. Hanson, N.R.Patterns of discovery: An inquiry into the conceptual foundations of science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.1965.
8. Thayer-Bacon, B. J. An examination and redescription of epistemology.1996. Retrieved December 5,2008, from ERIC website: http://www.eric.ed.gov:80/ERICWebPortal/custom/ portlets/cordDetails/detailmini.jsp?_nfpb=true&_&ERICExtSearch_SearchValue_0=ED401279&ERIC ExtSearch_SearchType_0=no&accno=ED401279.
9. Bryant, A. Grounded theory and pragmatism: The curious case of Anselm Strauss. Forum:Qualitative Social Research,2009, 10(3). Art. 2. Retrieved July 4, 2011, from http://www.qualitativeresearch.net/index.php/fqs/article/viewArticle/1358/2850
10. Charmaz, K. Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: Sage.2006.
11. Clarke, A.E. Situational analysis: Grounded theory after the postmodern turn. Thousand Oaks:Sage.2005.
12. Dey, I. . Grounding grounded theory. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.1999.
13. Dunne, C. The place of the literature review in grounded theory research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. 2011. 14( 2) .111–124 .
14. Kelle, U. The development of categories: Different approaches in grounded theory. In A. Bryant
15. & K. Charmaz (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of grounded theory (pp. 191–213). Los Angeles: Sage.2007.
16. Lempert, L. B.Asking questions of the data: Memo writing in the grounded theory tradition.2007. In A.Bryant & K. Charmaz (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of grounded theory (pp. 245–264). Los Angeles: Sage.
17. Schreiber, R. S. The “how to” of grounded theory: Avoiding the pitfalls. In R. S. Schreiber & P.
18. N. Stern (Eds.), Using grounded theory in nursing (pp. 55–83). New York: Springer Publishing Company.2001.
19. Kools, S. McCarthy, M., Durham, R., & Robrecht, R. Dimensional analysis: Broadening the conception of grounded theory. Qualitative Health Research. 1996,6(3), pp. 312–330.
20. Elkins, J. Visual Studies: A skeptical introduction. New York: Routledge.2003.
21. Hallberg. L.R.M. Some thoughts about the literature review in grounded theory studies.international journal of qualitative studies in health well-being. 2010; 5(3).
22. McCalin. A.M. Grappling with the literature in a grounded theory and the existing literatrue :four phases for consideration .grounded theory review.2006,5.47-50.
23. Bruce, C. Questions arising about emergence, data collection and its interaction with analysis in a grounded theory study. International Journal of Qualitative Methods,2007,6(1).51-68.
24. Suddaby, R. From the editors: What grounded theory is not. Academy of Management Journal. 2006,49(4), 633–642.
25. Johnson, M., Long, T., & White, A. Arguments for ‘British Pluralism’ in qualitative health research. Journal of Advanced Nursing.2001, 33(2), 243–249.
26. Glaser, B. Theoretical sensitivity . Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.1978.
27. Glaser, B. Doing Grounded Theory: Issues and Discussion. Mill Valley, California: Sociology Press.1998.
28. Nathaniel, A.K.Thoughts on the literature review and GT. Grounded Theory Review,2006, 5(2/3), 35–41.
29. Locke, K. Grounded theory in management research. London: Sage.2001.
30. Dick, B. What can grounded theorists and action researchers learn from each other? In A. Bryant & K. Charmaz (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of grounded theory (pp. 398–416). London: Sage.2007.
31. Holton, J. The coding process and its challenges. In A. Bryant & K. Charmaz (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of grounded theory (pp. 265–289). London: Sage.2007.
32. Heath H. Exploring the influences and use of the literature during a grounded theory study. Journal of Research in Nursing, London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi.2006, 11(6) 519–528
33. Glaser, B.G. Basics of grounded theory analysis . Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.1992.
34. McCallin, A.M. Grappling with the literature in a grounded theory study. Contemporary Nurse.2003, 15(1–2), 61–69.
35. McGhee, G. and Marland, G.R. and Atkinson, J.M. Grounded theory research: literature reviewing and reflexivity. Journal of Advanced Nursing .2007, 60(3), 334-342.
36. Wiener, C. Making teams work in conducting grounded theory. In A. Bryant & K. Charmaz (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of grounded theory (pp. 293–310). London: Sage.2007.
37. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Buick Mirzai .Tehran: Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies.1385.
38. Coyne, I., & Cowley, S. Using grounded theory to research parent participation. Journal of Research in Nursing.2006, 11(6), 501–515.
39. Chiovitti, R.F., & Piran, N. Rigour and grounded theory research. Journal of Advanced Nursing.2003, 44(4), 427–435.
40. Creswell, J. Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.1998.
41. Hutchinson, S.A. Grounded theory: The method. In P.L. Munhall & C.A. Boyd (Eds.),Nursing research: A qualitative perspective (2nd ed., pp. 180–212). New York: National League for Nursing Press.1993.
42. McCann, T. & Clark, E. Grounded theory in nursing research: Part 1 – Methodology. Nurse Researcher.2003, 11(2), 7–18.
43. Urquhart, C. The evolving nature of grounded theory method: The Case of the information systems discipline. In A. Bryant & K. Charmaz (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of grounded theory (pp. 339–360). London: Sage.2007.
44. Denzin, N.K. The interpretive process. In M. Huberman & M.B. Miles (Eds.), The qualitative researcher’s companion (pp. 340–368). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.2002.
45. McMenamin, I. Process and text: Teaching students to review the literature. PS: Political Science and Politics.2006, 39(1), 133–135.
46. Coffey, A., & Aktinson, P. Making sense of qualitative data: Complementary research strategies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.1996.
47. Cutcliffe, J.R. Methodological issues in grounded theory. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 31(6).2000, 1474–1484.
48. Eisenhardt, K.M. Building theories from case . In M. Huberman & M.B. Miles (Eds.),The qualitative researcher’s companion (pp. 5–36). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.2002.
49. Layder, D. Sociological practice: Linking theory and social research. London:Sage.1998.
50. Eisenhardt, K.M. Building theories from case. In M. Huberman & M.B. Miles (Eds.),The qualitative researcher’s companion (pp. 5–36). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.2002.
51. Robson C. Real world research. 2nd edn. Blackwell, Oxford.2002.
52. Charmaz, K. Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructivist methods. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Strategies of qualitative inquiry (2nd ed., pp. 249-291). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.2003.
53. Cutcliffe, J. R. Reconsidering reflexivity: Introducing the case for intellectual entrepreneurship. Qualitative Health Research, 2003, 13(1), 136-148. doi: 10.1177/1049732302239416.
54. Neil S. Grounded Theory Sampling. Journal of research in Nursing. 2006, 11(3), 253–260.
55. Backman K. & Kyngas A. Challenges of the grounded theory approach to a novice researcher. Nursing and Health Sciences.1999, 1(3) 147–153.
56. Hall, W. A., & Callery, P. Enhancing the rigor of grounded theory: Incorporating reflexivity and relationality. Qualitative Health Research,2001, 11(2), 257-272.
57. Gentles, S. J. Jack, S. M. A Critical Approach to Reflexivity in Grounded Theor. The Qualitative Report.2014, 19( 25), 1-14 . http://www.nova.edu/ssss/ QR/QR19/ gentles25.pdf.
)