Journal of Qualitative Research in Health Sciences

Authors

Abstract

Introduction: Theoretical reflexivity is a concept that has been widely accepted in health research and most researchers have acknowledged the importance of reflexivity in the clarity and increased accuracy of qualitative research. The purpose of this study was to introduce, explain the importance of, and describe reflexivity ‎as an important characteristic of qualitative research.

Method: This research was conducted using library and internet resources without time limitation until 2015. Information was collected by searching library resources and scientific websites. Then, relevant articles were selected and their contents were extracted.

Results: There are many factors for the improvement of the quality of a qualitative study; one of these factors is reflexivity‎. Reflexivity ‎is a characteristic of research that can be considered during the whole process of qualitative research and is not limited to a certain stage. It is an extensive activity in which the researcher tries to be aware of his/her ideas, attitudes, and beliefs and make their influence on his/her own research clear for him/herself and sometimes the audience. Despite the existing doubts about the ability to conduct it, almost all experts in qualitative research have emphasized its necessity in qualitative research, especially in the field of health. Creating reflexivity in qualitative research and preserving it during the development of qualitative research will increase their precision and accuracy.

Conclusion: Reflexivity ‎can enrich qualitative research, improve their quality, and prevent the occurrence of bias. Therefore, attention to this factor is recommended in every step of qualitative research.


Keywords

1. Koch T, Harrington A. Reconceptualizing rigour: the case for reflexivity, journal of ‎advanced nursing,28(4),882-890‎. 1998. 2. Gentles SJ, Jack SM, Nicholas DB, McKibbon K. Critical Approach to Reflexivity in Grounded Theory. The Qualitative Report. 2014;19(44):1-14. 3. Abedi HA. Application of phenomenology research method in medical sciences (Persian)‎. Rahbord journal. 2011;54:207-24. 4. Corbin J, Strauss A. Basics of Qualitative Research.3th ed. London: Sage. 2008. 5. Moon T. Reflexivity and its usefulness when conducting a secondary analysis of existing data. Psychology & Society. 2008;1(7). 6. DCruz H, Gillingham P, Melendez S. Reflexivity: A concept and its meanings for practitioners working with children and families. Critical social work. 2007;8(1):1-18. 7. Mauthner NS, Doucet A. Reflexive accounts and accounts of reflexivity in qualitative data analysis. Sociology. 2003;37(3):413-31. 8. Popoveniuc B. Self Reflexivity. The Ultimate End of Knowledge. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2014;163:204-13. 9. Lambert C, Jomeen J, McSherry W. Reflexivity: a review of the literature in the context of midwifery research. British Journal of Midwifery. 2010;18(5):321. 10. Ryan T. When you reflect are you also being reflexive. The Ontario Action Researcher. 2005;8(1). 11. Seale C. Quality in qualitative research. Qualitative inquiry. 1999;5(4):465-78. 12. Finlay L. "Outing" the researcher: the provenance, process, and practice of reflexivity. Qual Health Res. 2002;12(4):531-45. Epub 2002/04/10. 13. Castaneda H-N. The reflexivity of self-consciousness: Sameness/identity, data for artificial intelligence. Philosophical Topics. 1989;17(1):27-58. 14. Smith R. Does reflexivity separate the human sciences from the natural sciences? History of the Human Sciences. 2005;18(4):1-25. 15. Clancy M. Is reflexivity the key to minimising problems of interpretation in phenomenological research? Nurse Researcher 20:6, 12-16 Online publication date: 1-Jul-2013. 2013. 16. Sullivan GB. Reflexivity and Subjectivity in Qualitative Research: The Utility of a Wittgensteinian Framework. 2002. 2002;3(3). Epub 2002-09-30. 17. Mays N, Pope C. Qualitative research in health care: Assessing quality in qualitative research. BMJ: British Medical Journal. 2000;320(7226):50. 18. Streubert SHJ, Carpenter DR. Qualitative Research in Nursing-Advancing the Humanistic Imperative. ‎‎ 4th Edition. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins;. 2007. 19. Neill SJ. Grounded theory sampling The contribution of reflexivity. Journal of Research in Nursing. 2006;11(3):253-60. 20. Carolan M. Reflexivity: a personal journey during data collection. Nurse researcher. 2003;10(3):7-14. 21. Warwick R. Reflexivity – an innovative leadership research methodology and an ongoing means to develop personal effectiveness. 2011. 22. Cutcliffe JR. Reconsidering reflexivity: introducing the case for intellectual entrepreneurship. Qual Health Res. 2003;13(1):136-48. Epub 2003/02/05. 23. Finlay L, Gough B. Reflexivity a Practical Guide for Researchers in Health and Social Sciences: Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo); 2003. 24. Charmaz M. Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. London: Sage publicatins. 2006:188-9. 25. Morrow SL. Quality and trustworthiness in qualitative research in counseling psychology: Journal of counseling psychology 52 (2) 2005:250-60. 26. Polit DF, Beck CT. Essentials of Nursing research, appraising evidence for nursing practice: Williams & Wilkins Ltd. 8th edition. 2014:321-31. 27. Engward H, Davis G. Being reflexive in qualitative grounded theory: discussion and application of a model of reflexivity. Journal of advanced nursing. 2015;71(7):1530-8. Epub 2015/04/01. 28. Robertson S. Masculinity and reflexivity in health research with men. Auto/Biography. 2006;14(4):302. 29. Pillow W. Confession, catharsis, or cure? Rethinking the uses of reflexivity as methodological power in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education. 2003;16(2):175-96. 30. Krefting L. Rigor in qualitative research: The assessment of trustworthiness. American journal of occupational therapy. 1991;45(3):214-22. 31. Tskeris C, Katrivesis N. Reflexivity in sociological theory and social action. Facta Universitatis. 2008;7(1):1-12. 32. Schneider, zevia, Elliott, Doug, Lobindo– Wood, Geri, et al. Nursing , Research (methods , Critical appraisal and utilization )Second Edition,Mosby. 2004. 33. Guillaume X. Reflexivity and Subjectivity: A Dialogical Perspective for and on International Relations Theory. 2002. 2002;3(3). Epub 2002-09-30. 34. Glaser BG. Constructivist Grounded Theory? 2002. 2002;3(3). Epub 2002-09-30. 35. strauss A, corbin J. Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. 1990. 36. Chesnay MD. Nursing Research Using Grounded Theory: Qualitative Designs and Methods in nursing. Springer Publishing Company,New York. 2015:162. 37. Jootun D, McGhee G, Marland GR. Reflexivity: promoting rigour in qualitative research. Nursing Standard. 2009;23(23):42. 38. Taylor C, White S. Practising reflexivity in health and welfare. Buckingham: Philadelphia. 2000. 39. McGhee G, Marland GR, Atkinson J. Grounded theory research: literature reviewing and reflexivity. Journal of advanced nursing. 2007;60(3):334-42. 40. Powers BA, Knapp TR. Dictionary of Nursing Theory and Research: Fourth Edition. Springer Publishing Company,New York. 2011:155. 41. Hughes C. Developing reflexivity in research. Teaching Research Process, University of Warwick Department of Sociology. 2012. 42. Nolan S. An Exploration of the Primary to Secondary School Transition in an Irish Context: University of East London; 2012. 43. Barry CA, Britten N, Barber N, Bradley C, Stevenson F. Using reflexivity to optimize teamwork in qualitative research. Qual Health Res. 1999;9(1):26-44