Journal of Qualitative Research in Health Sciences
Journal of Qualitative Research in Health Sciences

The Role of Observation in Grounded Theory: A Narrative Review

Authors

Tahereh Fathi Najafi
Robab Latifnejad Roudsari

Mashhad medical Sciencce

Abstract
Introduction: Grounded theory has become one of the most important interdisciplinary methods of research because of its attention to social interactions and investigation of hidden processes in social behaviors. This study aimed to explain observation as a tool in grounded theory and to place this data collection method parallel to interviews in terms of importance.

Method: This was a narrative review of the literature. First, the available databases (Google Scholar, PubMed, SID, and Magiran) were searched using the keywords observation, qualitative study, and grounded theory, and the indicators AND and OR. As a result, 21 books, 2 professional websites, and 38 articles in English and 18 in Farsi were retrieved. After the final revision, 6 books, and 10 articles in English and 4 in Farsi, which discussed the nature and scope of observation in qualitative studies, were included in the review.

Results: Studies show that although interview is the most important and perhaps the most practical tool for collecting data in grounded theory studies, this method cannot always help the researcher to investigate a social phenomenon from different perspectives. Awareness of observation method, ability of the observer, the pros and cons of observation, ethics of observation, and applied guidelines for observation are issues which can help qualitative researchers who adopt symbolic interactionism as theoretical perspective in their qualitative inquiry.

Conclusion: Conducting precise observation through which the researcher is totally immersed in the phenomenon under study with curiosity, application of scientific observation principles and methods, as well as employment of in-depth interviews can help qualitative researchers to discover social processes hidden in human interactions.

Keywords

Observation
Grounded theory approach
Narrative review
1. Flick U. Doing Ethhnograghic Observational research. First Edition. SAGE publication ; 2007. 2. Abbaszadeh M.Validity and reliability in qualitative researches. Appl soci.2012;23(1):19-34. 3. Strauss A,Corbin J. Basics of Qualitative Research Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Sage Publications; 1998. 4. Stauss A. Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge University Press; 2003. 5. Charmaz K.Constructing Grounded Theory:A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis.second edition. SAGE Publications; 2006. 6. Aldiabat K. Le Navenec C.Philosophical Roots of Classical Grounded Theory: Its Foundations in Symbolic Interactionism. The Qualit Report .2011;16(4): 1063-1080. 7. Sabour S, Ghasemi F. The ethical issues in observational study on adulecent. The Iranian journal of Medical ethichs . 2011;90 (5):92-103 8. Taleghani A. The conclusion of observed from unobserved situation.Metodology of Sicial Science and Humanities. 2012;18(70):79-102. 9. Miels M, Huberman M, Saldana J.Qualitative data analysis: A methods soursebook. The third Edition. SAGE publication; 2014. 10. Oxford Learner's Dictionary. Oxford University press.2014. 11. Mohamadi B. Observation unit in qualitative study.Iranian Journal anthropology research.2013;3(2):149-162. 12. Emani M.Ethnography research in quantitative and qualitatine study.available at www.urbanmanagement.ir. 13. Vahedifard S. participant observation. Journal of Social Sciences .2009;22:82-89. 14. Mohamadi B.Observation in qualitative study. Iranian Journal of Anthropology Research .2013;3(2):145-162. 15. Paterson B, Bottorff J, Hewat R. Blending Observational Methods: Possibilities, Strategies, and Challenges. InternationalJournal of Qualitative Methods .2003; 2 (1):1-19. 16. Locke K. Grounded theory in management researh. The second publication. Sage Publication; 2003. 17. Hume L, Mulcock J. Anthropologist in field:cases in participant observation. Columbia University Press;2004. 18. Gibson W, Brown A. Working with qualitative data. The first edition. Sage publication ;2009. 19. Janson R, Wiertz L,Meyer E, Nouldos L.Reliability analysis of observational data:Problems, solutions, and software implementation.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers.2003;35 (3): 391-399. 20. Kawulich B.Qualitative Social Research. 2005; 6(2):43-53. 21. Jorgensen D.Paticipant observation: A methodology for human studies. SAGE publication;1989. 22. Robert M. Emerson, Rachel I. Fretz, and Linda L. Shaw.Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes The Second Edition. Chicago Guides to Writing, Editing, and Publishing;2011 23. Griffiths C.Using Grounded Theory to Analyze Qualitative Observational Data that is Obtained by Video Recording .Grounded theory review an international journal.2013; 14(1). 24. Perlman M.Ethical issues in observational research.Paediatr Child Health .2000;5 (2):89-91. 25. Li J. Ethical Challenges in Participant Observation: A Reflection on Ethnographic Fieldwork. The qualitative report.2008;13(1):102-114. 26. Guidelines for Ethical Conduct in Participant Observation:University of Toronto Social Sciences and Humanities Research Ethics Board (SSH REB) available at: www. research.utoronto.ca/wp.content/upload.
Journal of Qualitative Research in Health Sciences
Volume 5, Issue 2
2016
Pages 221-229

  • Receive Date 08 July 2020

Home page

Submit Manuscript

Guide for Reviewers

Contact Us