Criteria of Validity and Reliability in Qualitative Research

Author

Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences

Abstract

Introduction: Today, with emerging qualitative methodology, questions about the validity and reliability in qualitative research findings have raised. According to different views about validity and reliability of qualitative research, this study aimed to determine the main criteria of validity and reliability in qualitative research from the view pointes of experts groups.
Method: In this cross-sectional descriptive research, internet scientific search was done in national and international valid databases including Irandoc, PubMed, CINAHL, ScienceDirect, and Thomson Reuters Web of Science using keywords about the validity and reliability of qualitative research. The articles focusing on the validity and reliability in qualitative research in the area of health and hygiene during the years after 2002 were extracted and assessed.
Results: A total of 25 research and review articles, and other resources related to reliability and validity of qualitative research since 2002 were extracted and assessed. There were variety of methods, and interpretive viewpoints about the validity and reliability of qualitative researches. Evaluation methods to gain credibility and reliability in qualitative researches depended on researchers' ontological, epistemological, and theoretical attitudes and insights.
Conclusion: Any researcher depending on his/her theoretical insights selects a separated method to assess the reliability of their qualitative researches. The reliability and validity in qualitative researches depend on asking principle questions about the nature of research, recognition of it, the logic governing it, and the trustworthiness of results.

Keywords


1- Cua Francis, Theivananthampillai Paul. Understanding Quality in Qualitative Research in IS. Department of Accountancy and Business Law, Working paper. 2009; no18 2- Rolfe Gary. Validity, trustworthiness and rigour: quality and the idea of qualitative research. J Adv Nurs. 2009; vol 53(3): 304–310 3- Graneheim U.H, Lundman B. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today. 2011;no 24: 105–112 4- Guba E. G. Criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiries. Educational Communication and technology Journal. 1991; 29 (2) 5- Johnson Kevin E. comparing and contrasting quantitative and qualitative research methods. Mixed method research. NOVA southeastern university. 2008 6- Walsh Denis, Downe soo. Appraising the quality of qualitative research. Midwifery J. 2010; 22, 108–119 7- Patton Michael. Two decades of developments in qualitative inquiry: A personal, experiential perspective. Qualitative social wor. 2012; 1(3) 8- Malterud Kirsti. Qualitative research: standards, challenges, and guidelines. Lancet. 2008; 358: 483–88 9- Saie Ali.Methodological research in sociological sciences.Tehran: Samt publication, 2009. 10- Bryman, Alan, Social Research Method, Oxford University Press.2001 11- Buik Mohammadi.An introduction to the qualitative research mthod.Tehran: institute for humanities and cultural studies, 2008. 12- Danaiefar Hassan, Mozaffari zaynab.Improve validity and reliability in managerial qualitative research:focues on research verification strategies.management researches J. 2007;1(1):131-162 (persian) 13- Clissett Philip. Evaluating qualitative research. Journal of Orthopaedic Nursing. 2013; 12, 99–105 14- Oskouie S.Fatemeh, Peyrovi hamid.qualitative research in nursing.Tehran: Iran university of Medical Science, 2009. 15- Uwe flick. An introduction to the qualitative research.translation by Hadie Jalili.Tehran: nei publication, 2011. 16- Murphy F.J, Yielder J. Establishing rigour in qualitative radiography research. Radiography J. 2010;vol 16,62-67 17- Adib Hajbagheri Mohsen, Parvizi Sorur, Salsali Mahvash.qualitative research methods.Tehran: Boshra publication, 2007. 18- Sarantakos S. Social research. Second edition. South Melbourne: 1998; Macnilon. 19- Seale Clive. Quality Issues in Qualitative Inquiry. Qualitative Social Work,Sage J. 2015; 1(1): 97–110 20- Sparkes Andrew C, Smith Brett. Judging the quality of qualitative inquiry: Criteriology and relativism in action. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2009;10, 491–497 21- Long T, Johnson M. Rig our, reliability and validity in qualitative research. Clin Eff Nurs. 2010; 4,30–37 22- Taleghani Fariba."Adaptation process in weman with breast cancer"(PhD nursing dissertation), Tehran University of Medical Science, 2005. 23- Sharts-Hopko Nancy C. Assessing Rigor in Qualitative Research. J Assoc Nurses AIDS Care. 2012; 13(4):84-86 24- Morse Janice M and et al. Verification Strategies for Establishing Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. 2012;1(2) 25- Nobel H, Smit J. Issues of validity and reliability in qualitative research. Evid Based Nurs. 2016;18: 34-36 26- Leung L. Validity, reliability, and generalizability in qualitative research. Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care.2015; 4(3): 324-327
Volume 7, Issue 4 - Serial Number 46
46
January 2018
Pages 493-499
  • Receive Date: 08 July 2020
  • Revise Date: 07 August 2022
  • Accept Date: 08 July 2020
  • First Publish Date: 08 July 2020