Journal of Qualitative Research in Health Sciences

Authors

Nursing PhD, Assistant Professor of Nursing, Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran

Abstract

Introduction: A qualitative research is based on a series of fundamental principles and basic concepts. The two main concepts in designing and theory development are theoretical sensitivity and reflexivity that have not been sufficiently addressed in Persian sources. Thus, this study was conducted to clarify and explain these concepts.
Method: In this review study, the libraries and electronic documents across various sites and databases including Science Direct, PubMed, Ovid, Wiley Online Library, and Google Scholar were searched for keywords of reflexivity, reflexive, sensitivity, sensitive, and theoretical sensitivity. Inclusion criteria included all open access texts contained the before-mentioned keywords in the title, written in English language and published in 2010 and later. After excluding irrelevant, duplicate, and non-accessible texts, 16 articles and 11 books were obtained.
Results: The results showed that literature investigated issues such as definitions of these concepts, theoretical sensitivity sources and ways to improve it, the importance of reflexivity, its scope and improvement methods, reflexivity and morality, and the report of reflexivity.
Conclusion: The theoretical sensitivity refers to the researcher characteristics such as insight and skills to make data meaningful, perception and analysis of relevant elements from irrelevant elements that must be followed as a matter of principle in all steps of the research. Paying attention to reflexivity increases the quality of the research processes and results, and also increases researcher's sensitivity to the participants.

Keywords

Gerrish K, Lathlean J. The Research Process in Nursing. 7th ed. US: Wiley Blackwell Publishing; 2015. 2. Mohajan HK. Qualitative research methodology in social sciences related suand bjects. Journal of Economic Development, Environment and People 2018; 7(1): 23-48. 3. Corbin J, Strauss A. Basics of Qualitative Research. 3rd ed. US: Sage Publications; 2007. 4. Berger R. Now I see it, now I don’t: Researcher’s position and reflexivity in qualitative research. Qualitative Research 2015; 15(2): 219-34. 5. Lawrence J, Tar U. The use of grounded theory technique as a practical tool for qualitative data collection and analysis. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods 2013; 11(1): 29-40. 6. Reay G, Bouchal SR, A Rankin J. Staying theoretically sensitive when conducting grounded theory research. Nurse Res 2016; 24(1): 26-30. مفاهیم حساسیت نظری و بازاندیشی نازیلا جوادی پاشاکی و همکار http://jqr.kmu.ac.ir 8938 /ویژهنامه/تابستان 8مجله تحقیقات کیفی در علوم سلامت/سال 06 7. Chong CH, Yeo KJ. An overview of grounded theory design in educational research. Asian Social Science 2015; 11(12): 258-68. 8. Simmons OE. Is that a real theory or did you just make it up? Teaching classic grounded theory. Grounded Theory Review 2010; 9(2): 15-38. 9. Speziale HS, Streubert HJ, Carpenter DR. Qualitative research in nursing: Advancing the Humanistic Imperative. 5th ed. China: Wolters Kluwer, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2011. 10. Merriam SB, Tisdell EJ. Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation. 4th ed. USA: John Wiley & Sons; 2016. 11. Patton MQ. Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods: Integrating Theory and Practice. 4th ed. USA: Sage Publications; 2015. 12. Gentles SJ, Jack SM, Nicholas DB, McKibbon KA. Critical approach to reflexivity in grounded theory. The Qualitative Report 2014; 19(44): 1-14. 13. Kaiser G, Presmeg N. Compendium for EarlyCareer Researchersin Mathematics Education. Switzerland: Springer; 2019. 14. Strauss A, Corbin JM. Basics Qualitative Research, Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. 3rd ed. US: Sage; 2008. 15. Forrester MA. Doing Qualitative Research in Psychology: A Practical Guide. London: Sage; 2010. 16. Santos JL, Erdmann AL, Sousa FG, Lanzoni GM, Melo AL, Leite JL. Methodological perspectives in the use of grounded theory in nursing and health research. Esc Anna Nery Rev Enferm 2016; 20(3): e20160056. 17. Palaganas EC, Sanchez MC, Molintas MP, Caricativo RD. Reflexivity in qualitative research: A journey of learning. The Qualitative Report 2017; 22(2): 426-38. 18. Patnaik E. Reflexivity: Situating the researcher in qualitative research. Humanities and Social Science Studies 2013; 2(2): 98-106. 19. Ramalho R, Adams P, Huggard P, Hoare K. Literature review and constructivist grounded theory methodology. Forum: Qualitative Social Research 2015; 16(3): Art. 19. 20. Thornberg R. Informed grounded theory. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 2012; 56(3): 243-59. 21. Alvesson M, Skoldberg K. Reflexive Methodology: New Vistas for Qualitative Research. 2nd ed. London: Sage Publications; 2009. 22. Imel S. Reflective practice in adult education. [cited 2017 May 21]. Available from: http://www.ericdigests.org/1992-3/adult.htm 23. Lambert C, Jomeen J, McSherry W. Reflexivity: A review of the literature in the context of midwifery research. British Journal of Midwifery 2010; 18(5): 321-6. 24. Boud D, Keogh R, Walker D. Reflection: Turning Experience into Learning. London: Taylor and Francis Group; 2013. 25. Helyer R. Learning through reflection: The critical role of reflection in Work-Based Learning (WBL). J Work Appl Manag 2015; 7(1): 15-27. 26. Darawsheh W, Stanley M. Reflexivity in research: Promoting rigour, reliability and validity in qualitative research. International Journal of Therapy & Rehabilitation 2014; 21(12): 560-8. 27. Tomkins L, Eatough V. Towards an integrative reflexivity in organizational research. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management 2010; 5(2): 162-81.