Journal of Qualitative Research in Health Sciences
Journal of Qualitative Research in Health Sciences

Women’s Lived Experiences of Cohabitation: A Phenomenological Study

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

bahareh kakavand 1
anahita khodabakhshi-koolaee 2

1 MSc in Family Counseling, Department of Psychology and Educational Sciences, School of Humanities, Khatam University, Tehran, Iran

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Psychology and Educational Sciences, School of Humanities, Khatam University, Tehran, Iran

https://doi.org/10.22062/jqr.2021.193666.0
Abstract
Introduction: The phenomenon of cohabitation or what is known in Iran as “white marriage” has presented women with new psychological and social challenges. The present study aimed to address the lived experience of cohabiting women.
Methods: This qualitative and descriptive study was conducted using a phenomenological approach. The participants were 17 women who were selected through purposive sampling from among those who referred to health centers in District 22 of Tehran in 2018. The data were collected using semi-structured interviews with the participants and were saturated after 17 interviews. The collected data were analyzed using Colaizzi’s seven-step method.
Results: The women’s psychological and emotional needs were classified into three main themes including “experiencing a relationship with a partner with fear and hope”, “satisfaction of emotional, psychological, and sexual needs” and “concerns about an uncertain future”.
Conclusion: The main motivation for the women to be involved in this relationship was their disinterest in accepting responsibility. They also considered this relationship as a way to satisfy their sexual needs. Following these results, family and marriage counselors should take into account the serious harm that such relationships will have on the lives of future women.

Keywords

Cohabitation
Lived experience
Women
Qualitative research
  1. Hank K, Steinbach A. Families, and their institutional contexts: the role of family policies and legal regulations. Köln Z Soziol 2019; 71(Suppl 1):375-98.
  2. Perelli-Harris B, Hoherz S, Addo F, Lappegard T, Evans A, Sassler S, et al. Do marriage and cohabitation provide benefits to health in mid-life? the role of childhood selection mechanisms and partnership characteristics across countries. Popul Res Policy Rev 2018; 37(5):703-28. doi: 10.1007/s11113-018-9467-3.
  3. Khalajabadi Farahani F, Mehyar AH. The role of family in premarital heterosexual relationships among female university students in Tehran. Journal of Family Research 2011; 6(24):449-68. [In Persian].
  4. Golchin M, Safari S. Tehran metropolis and the emergence of symptoms of new form of the male-female relationships; the study of the fields, processes and consequences of cohabitation. Journal of Iranian Culture research 2017; 10(1):29-57. [In Persian].
  5. Mahboobi E. “White marriage" in contemporary Iran. Imperial Journal of Interdisciplinary Research 2016; 2(12):1283-8.
  6. Khodaverdian S, Khodabakhshi Koolaee A, Sanagoo A. Explanation of psychological and social adjustment of young girls on emotional breakdown experience: a qualitative study. Iranian Journal of Psychiatric Nursing 2020; 8(1):1-9. [In Persian].
  7. Soulsby LK, Bennett KM. When two become one: exploring identity in marriage and cohabitation. Journal of Family Issues 2017; 38(3):358-80. doi: 10.1177/0192513X15598547.
  8. Azadarmaki T, Sharifi Saei MH, Isari M, Talebi S. The typology of premarital sex patterns in Iran. Journal Management System 2012; 2(2):1-34. [In Persian].
  9. Kgadima NP. Cohabitation in the context of changing family practices: lessons for social work intervention [dissertation]. Pretoria: University of South Africa; 2017.
  10. Perelli-Harris B, Berrington A, Sánchez Gassen N, Galezewska P, Holland JA. The rise in divorce and cohabitation: is there a link? Popul Dev Rev 2017; 43(2):303-29. doi: 10.1111/padr.12063.
  11. Gravningen K, Mitchell KR, Wellings K, Johnson AM, Geary R, Jones KG, et al. Reported reasons for the breakdown of marriage and cohabitation in Britain: Findings from the third National Survey of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles (Natsal-3). PloS One 2017; 12(3):e0174129. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone. 0174129.
  12. Waggoner LW. Marriage is on the decline and cohabitation is on the rise: at what point, if ever, should unmarried partners acquire marital rights? Family Law Quarterly 2016; 50(2):215-46.
  13. Nosratinejad F, Bahrami G. The determinants of cohabitation. Quarterly Journal of Social Work 2017; 6(2):35-42. [In Persian].
  14. Karimiyan N, Zarei E. A qualitative study: the effect of opposite-sex premarital cohabitation on women’s life status. Quarterly Journal of Woman and Society 2016; 7(26):39-68. [In Persian].
  15. Svodziwa M, Kurete F. Cohabitation among tertiary education students: an exploratory study in Bulawayo. Human and Social Studies 2017; 6(1):138-48. doi: 10.1515/hssr-2016-0009.
  16. Khodabakhshi Koolaee A. Living in home quarantine: analyzing psychological experiences of college students during Covid-19 pandemic. Journal of Military Medicine 2020; 22(2):130-8. doi: 10.30491/JMM.22.2.130. [In Persian].
  17. Shosha GA. Employment of Colaizzi's strategy in descriptive phenomenology: a reflection of a researcher. European Scientific Journal 2012; 8(27):31-43. doi: 10.19044/esj.2012.v8n27p%25p.
  18. Rezaei M, Khodabakhshi Koolaee A, Falsafinejad MR, Sanagoo A. Identifying the psychological challenges of mothers with a chronically ill child: a phenomenological study. Journal of Qualitative Research in Health Sciences 2020; 9(1):18-27. doi: 10.22062/jqr.2020.90999.
  19. Khodabakhshi Koolaee A, Pishbahar Z. The life experiences of single and unemployed 30-40-year-old girls in Tehran city. Cultural Psychology 2020; 3(2):171-86. doi: 10.30487/jcp.2020.212816.1100. [In Persian].

 

Journal of Qualitative Research in Health Sciences
Volume 10, Issue 2
Spring 2021
Pages 75-82

  • Receive Date 28 August 2019
  • Accept Date 28 October 2019

Home page

Submit Manuscript

Guide for Reviewers

Contact Us