Psychological Reactions and the Process of Coping with Marital Infidelity in Couples: A Grounded Theory Research

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 MSc in Family Counseling, Department of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Faculty of Humanities, Khatam University, Tehran, Iran

2 Associate Professor, Department of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Faculty of Humanities, Khatam University, Tehran, Iran

3 Associate Professor, Department of Assessment and Measurement, Faculty of Psychology and Education Science, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran

10.22062/jqr.2021.195198.1012

Abstract

Introduction: Marital infidelity as a traumatic event can endanger the married life of couples and lead them to divorce. This study aimed to identify the psychological reactions and the process of dealing with the disclosure of marital infidelity in the betrayed person.
Methods: The present study was conducted using a qualitative method based on grounded theory. The research population included all married people living in Tehran, who had experienced marital infidelity in their marital life. The participants were 20 individuals who experienced marital infidelity and were selected through purposive sampling in 2019. The data were collected via semi-structured interviews with the participants and analyzed simultaneously using open, axial, and selective coding.
Results: The reactions to the disclosure of marital infidelity were classified into two main themes (psychological reactions and physical reactions) and eight subthemes. The psychological reactions were shock and denial, anger and hatred, anxiety and rumination, feeling depressed and frustrated, cognitive errors, negative emotions, sleep disorders, and physical symptoms. The couples reacted to their spouse’s infidelity under the influence of contextual and situational factors and decided whether to continue living together. These decisions ranged from forgiving or not forgiving the spouse, forgetting the infidelity, coercion to continue living together, and separation and divorce.
Conclusion: The results of the study showed that with an awareness of the psychological reactions to the exposure of spousal infidelity and its contextual and situational factors, it is possible to understand the nature of problems and develop psychological interventions fitting couples’ social and cultural conditions.

Keywords


  1.  

     

    1. Ueda R, Yanagisawa K, Ashida H, Abe N. Implicit attitudes and executive control interact to regulate interest in extra-pair relationships. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2017; 17(6):1210-20. doi: 3758/s13415-017-0543-7.
    2. Qazvini M, Khodabakhshi koolaee A, Mansoor L, Khosh konesh A. The comparison of marital satisfaction and moral intelligence and its relationship with immoral commitment in men. Journal of Pizhūhish dar dīn va salāmat. 2015; 1(4):4-11. doi: 10.22037/jrrh.v1i4.9244.
    3. Spring JA. After the affair: Healing the pain and rebuilding trust when a partner has been unfaithful. New York:William Morrow; 2013.
    4. Buss DM. Sexual and emotional infidelity: Evolved gender differences in jealousy prove robust and replicable. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2018 ;13(2):155-60. doi: 10.1177/1745691617698225.
    5. Schonian S. Perceptions and definition of infidelity: A multi method study. [dissertation]. Las Vegas: University of Nevada; 2013.
    6. Shackelford TK, Besser A, Goetz AT. Personality, marital satisfaction, and probability of marital infidelity. Individual Differences Research. 2008; 6(1):13-25.
    7. Hertlein K, Piercy F. Internet infidelity: A critical review of the literature. The Family Journal. 2006; 14(4):366-71. doi: 10.1177/1066480706290508.
    8. Fincham FD, May RW. Infidelity in romantic relationships. Current Opinion in Psychology. 2017; 13:70-4. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.03.008.
    9. Gordon KC, Baucom DH, Snyder DK. Treating couples recovering from infidelity: An integrative approach. J Clin Psychol. 2005; 61(11):1393-405. doi: 10.1002/jclp.20189.
    10. Kubrebwa M, Wonderful D. Unmaking factors that propel men into extramarital affairs as perceived by men in Gweru's Mkoba suburb: Zimbabwe. Sch J Arts Humaniti Soc Sci, 2015; 3(1D):252-6.
    11. Fisher TD. Sex of experimenter and social norm effects on reports of sexual behavior in young men and women. Arch Sex Behav. 2007; 36(1):89-100. doi: 10.1007/s10508-006-9094-7. 
    12. Marin RA, Christensen A, Atkins DC. Infidelity and behavioral couple therapy: Relationship outcomes over 5 years following therapy. Couple and family psychology: Research and practice. 2014; 3(1):1-12. doi: 10.1037/cfp0000012.
    13. Baucom DH, Gordon KC, Snyder DK, Atkins DC, Christensen A. Treating affair couples: Clinical considerations and initial findings. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy. 2006; 20(4):375-92. doi: 10.1891/jcpiq-v20i4a004.
    14. Selterman D, Garcia  JR, Tsapelas    Motivations for extradyadic infidelity revisited. J Sex Res. 2019; 56(3):273-86. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2017.1393494.
    15. Bird MH, Butler MH, Fife S. The process of couple healing following infidelity. Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy. 2007; 6(4):1-26. doi: 1300/J398v06n04_01.
    16. Mark KP, Jansen E, Milhausen RR. Infidelity in heterosexual couples: Demographic, interpersonal, and personality-related predictors of extra dyadic sex. Arch Sex Behav. 2011; 40(5):971-82. doi: 10.1007/s10508-011-9771-z. 
    17. Khodabakhshi koolaee A, Bahrami S, Rasstak H. The quality of love and sexual satisfaction survey among loyal and unfaithful married men. Quarterly Journal of Social Work, 2017; 5(4):12-5. [In Persian]
    18. Gordon K, Baucom D, Snyder D. Forgiveness in couples: Divorce, infidelity, and couples therapy. In E. L. Worthington (Ed.), Handbook of forgiveness. New York: Routledge; 2005. P. 407-22.
    19. Ein Dor T, Perry Paldi A, Hirschberger G, Birnbaum GE, Deutsch D. Coping with mate poaching: Gender differences in detection of infidelity-related threats. Evolution and Human Behavior. 2015; 36(1):17-24. doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2014.08.002.
    20. Corbin J, Strauss A. Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. New York: Sage publications; 2014.
    21. Rezaei M, Khodabakhshi Koolaee A, Falsafinejad MR, Sanagoo A. Identifying the psychological challenges of mothers with a chronically ill child: A phenomenological Journal of Qualitative Research in Health Sciences. 2020; 9(1):18-27. doi: 10.22062/JQR.2020.90999.
    22. Cope DG. Methods and meanings: Credibility and trustworthiness of qualitative research. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2014; 41(1):89-91. doi: 10.1188/14.ONF.89-91.
    23. Amato PR, Rogers SJ. A longitudinal study of marital problems and subsequent divorce. Journal of Marriage and the Family. 1997: 59(3):612-24. doi: 10.2307/353949
    24. Atkins DC, Baucom DH, Jacobson NS. Understanding infidelity: Correlates in a national random sample. Fam Psychol. 2001; 15(4):735-49. doi: 10.1037//0893-3200.15.4.735.
    25. Liu C. A theory of marital sexual life. Journal of Marriage and Family. 2004; 62(2):363-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.00363.x.
    26. Kleine M. For better or for worse? the impact of accounts and attributions following sexual infidelity. West J Commun. 85(2):211-29. doi: 10.1080/10570314.2019.1702714.
    27. Lusterman DD. Infidelity: A survival guide. Oakland, California, USA: New Harbinger Publications; 2010.
    28. Roos LG, O'Connor V, Canevello A, Bennett JM. Post-traumatic stress and psychological health following infidelity in unmarried young adults. Stress and Health. 2019; 35(4):468-79. doi: 10.1002/smi.2880.
    29. Koolaee, A, Motlagh T, Esmaili A, Rahmatizadeh M. The comparison of early maladaptive schema and intimacy in marital infidelity and non-infidelity men. Iranian Journal of Psychiatric Nursing. 2014; 2(3):12-23. [In Persian]
    30. Dupree WJ, White MB, Olsen C, Lafleur CT. Infidelity treatment patterns: A practice-based evidence approach. American Journal of Family Therapy. 2007; 35(4):327-41. doi: 10.1080/01926180600969900.
    31. Vaughan P. To have and to hold: A personal handbook for building a strong marriage and preventing affairs. New York: William Morrow Paperbacks; 2010.
    32. Staples J. Couples process of healing from infidelity while therapy, A thesis for master of science degree in marriage and family therapy. Las Vegas: University of Nevada; 2010.
    33. Davis JR. Gold GJ. An examination of emotional empathy, attributions of stability, and the link between perceived remorse and forgiveness. Journal of Personality and Individual Differences, 2011; 50(3):392-97. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2010.10.031.
    34. Fife ST, Weeks G, Filbert J. Facilitating forgiveness in the treatment of infidelity: An interpersonal model. Journal of Family Therapy, 2013; 35(4):343-67. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6427.2011.00561.x.
    35. Johnson C, Stanley SM, Glenn ND, Amato P, Nock S, Markman H. Marriage in Oklahoma: 2001 Baseline statewide survey on marriage and divorce. Oklahoma city: Oklahoma Department of Human Services; 2001.
    36. Williams, K. A socio-emotional relational framework for infidelity: the relational justice approach. Fam Process. 2011; 50(4):516-28. doi: 10.1111/j.1545-5300.2011.01374.x.
    37. Khodaverdian S, khodabakhshi koolaee A, Sanagoo A. Explanation of psychological and social adjustment of young girls on emotional breakdown experience: A qualitative study. Iranian Journal of Psychiatric Nursing. 2020; 8(1):1-9.
Volume 11, Issue 2
June 2022
Pages 99-107
  • Receive Date: 31 October 2020
  • Revise Date: 25 May 2021
  • Accept Date: 13 June 2021
  • First Publish Date: 01 June 2022