Journal of Qualitative Research in Health Sciences
Journal of Qualitative Research in Health Sciences

The Experiences of Virtual Communities in Conducting Health Promotion During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Qualitative Study in Indonesia

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

Violita Siska Mutiara 1
Eti Poncorini Pamungkasari 2
Retna Siwi Padmawati 3, 4
Ari Probandari 2

1 Midwifery Study Program, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Kesehatan Tri Mandiri Sakti Bengkulu, Bengkulu, Indonesia

2 Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, Indonesia

3 Department of Health Behavior, Environment and Social Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Public Health, and Nursing, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia

4 Centre for Bioethics and Medical Humanities, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia

10.34172/jqr.1418
Abstract
Background: Virtual communities (VCs) have emerged as vital platforms for health promotion, remaining highly relevant during and beyond the COVID-19 pandemic. This study aimed to explore the experiences of VCs in health promotion during and after the COVID-19 pandemic in Indonesia, focusing on sustainability and potential enhancement.
Methods: This qualitative study employed a storytelling approach involving ten managers of VCs in Indonesia. Participants uploaded audiovisual recordings to Google Drive, which were shared with the researcher through a link to be transcribed verbatim and analyzed using OpenCode 4.02. For clarification and additional data, participants communicated via WhatsApp and provided follow-up information through Voicenotes, Zoom, and re-uploaded videos to Google Drive.
Results: VCs serve as crucial platforms for planning, social action, and local development to optimize the potential of community members. Key planning activities included member involvement, routine meetings, the nature of participation, strategies for maintaining the continuity of activities, and recruiting new members for discussion. Social action initiatives encompassed health education, training activities, development of learning media, overcoming obstacles, collaboration, habit change initiatives, and activities with stakeholders. Furthermore, local development activities featured evaluation processes, member stories, and socialization.
Conclusion: VCs prove to be effective media for health promotion during the COVID-19 pandemic. To sustain their existence, these communities must engage in strategic planning, comprehensive social activities, and local development initiatives.

Highlights

Violita Siska Mutiara (PubMed) (Google Scholar)

Keywords

Community organizing
Health promotion
Virtual community
  1. Fan H, Lederman R, Smith SP, Chang S. How trust is formed in online health communities: a process perspective. Commun Assoc Inf Syst. 2014;34(1):531-60. doi: 10.17705/1cais.03428.
  2. Lobchuk M, McClement S, Rigney M, Copeland A, Bayrampour H. A qualitative analysis of “naturalistic” conversations in a peer-led online support community for lung cancer. Cancer Nurs. 2015;38(5):E21-31. doi: 10.1097/ ncc.0000000000000207.
  3. Atanasova S, Kamin T, Petrič G. Exploring the benefits and challenges of health professionals’ participation in online health communities: emergence of (dis)empowerment processes and outcomes. Int J Med Inform. 2017;98:13-21. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.11.005.
  4. Gittelsohn J, Steckler A, Johnson CC, Pratt C, Grieser M, Pickrel J, et al. Formative research in school and community-based health programs and studies: “state of the art” and the TAAG approach. Health Educ Behav. 2006;33(1):25-39. doi: 10.1177/1090198105282412.
  5. Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19(6):349-57. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzm042.
  6. ICT Services and System Development and Division of Epidemiology and Global Health. OpenCode 4 [Internet]. Umeå: Umeå University; 2015. Available from: https://www. umu.se/en/department-of-epidemiology-and-global-health/ research/open-code2/.
  7. Connelly LM. Trustworthiness in qualitative research. Medsurg Nurs. 2016;25(6):435-6.
  8. Bromley R. Storying community: re-imagining regional identities through public cultural activity. Eur J Cult Stud. 2010;13(1):9-25. doi: 10.1177/1367549409352546.
  9. Sørensen K. Fostering digital health literacy to enhance trust and improve health outcomes. Comput Methods Programs Biomed Update. 2024;5:100140. doi: 10.1016/j. cmpbup.2024.100140.
  10. Fiedler M, Sarstedt M. Influence of community design on user behaviors in online communities. J Bus Res. 2014;67(11):2258- 68. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.06.014.
  11. Ye HJ, Feng Y, Choi BC. Understanding knowledge contribution in online knowledge communities: a model of community support and forum leader support. Electron Commer Res Appl. 2015;14(1):34-45. doi: 10.1016/j.elerap.2014.11.002.
  12. Visser LM, Bleijenbergh IL, Benschop YW, Van Riel AC, Bloem BR. Do online communities change power processes in healthcare? Using case studies to examine the use of online health communities by patients with Parkinson’s disease. BMJ Open. 2016;6(11):e012110. doi: 10.1136/ bmjopen-2016-012110.
  13. Tajudeen FP, Jaafar NI, Ainin S. Understanding the impact of social media usage among organizations. Inf Manage. 2018;55(3):308-21. doi: 10.1016/j.im.2017.08.004.
  14. Chiu CM, Huang HY, Cheng HL, Sun PC. Understanding online community citizenship behaviors through social support and social identity. Int J Inf Manage. 2015;35(4):504- 19. doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2015.04.009.
  15. Li S, Coduto KD, Morr L. Communicating social support online: the roles of emotional disclosures and gender cues in support provision. Telemat Inform. 2019;39:92-100. doi: 10.1016/j.tele.2019.02.004.
  16. Kim ES, Konrath SH. Volunteering is prospectively associated with health care use among older adults. Soc Sci Med. 2016;149:122-9. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.11.043.
  17. Münter L, Drachmann D, Ghanem M, Prinzellner Y, Smits C, Werner K, et al. Transforming health systems with design health literacy: presenting the 40-20-40 model for digital development. Comput Methods Programs Biomed Update. 2023;4:100122. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpbup.2023.100122.
  18. Hagg E, Dahinten VS, Currie LM. The emerging use of social media for health-related purposes in low and middle-income countries: a scoping review. Int J Med Inform. 2018;115:92- 105. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2018.04.010.
  19. van Kessel R, Wong BLH, Clemens T, Brand H. Digital health literacy as a super determinant of health: more than simply the sum of its parts. Internet Interv. 2022;27:100500. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2022.100500.
  20. Eskandari M, Abbaszadeh A, Borhani F. Social determinants of health care process in rural society of Iran from health care provider’s experience. J Qual Res Health Sci. 2012;1(3):159- 69. [Persian].
Journal of Qualitative Research in Health Sciences
Volume 14
Pages 1-9

  • Receive Date 03 April 2024
  • Revise Date 24 May 2024
  • Accept Date 21 October 2024

Home page

Submit Manuscript

Guide for Reviewers

Contact Us