Journal of Qualitative Research in Health Sciences

Journal of Qualitative Research in Health Sciences

Current Issue

By Issue

By Author

By Subject

Author Index

Keyword Index

About Journal

Aims and Scope

Editorial Board

Publication Ethics

Peer Review Process

Editorial Policy

Indexing and Abstracting

Related Links

Journal Metrics

FAQ

News

Guide for Authors

Galley Proof

Elderly User Engagement with Mobile Health Applications: A Qualitative Analysis of User Interface and User Experience for Enhanced Technology Acceptance through a Scoping Review

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Amity School of Communication, Amity University, Lucknow, India

2 University School of Design and Innovation, Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University, Delhi, India

10.34172/jqr.1346

Abstract

Background: Mobile health applications (mHealth Apps) are designed to align with user preferences to enhance engagement and create valuable experiences. This study aimed to investigate user interface (UI) design patterns in mHealth applications and promote technology acceptance among elderly users.
Methods: The study employed a scoping review methodology. A comprehensive search was conducted across databases using the PRISMA framework, and the Rayyan application was utilized to further compile data from various sources regarding mHealth usage among individuals aged 60 years and older. The scoping review synthesized and summarized findings on how the elderly adopt mHealth applications for health benefits.
Results: The findings indicated that factors such as visual clarity, color scheme, layout, intuitive navigation, iconography, and accessibility had a significant relationship with users’ behavioral intentions to engage with mHealth UIs. It is anticipated that designing interfaces based on the preferences of a certain group of users could enhance their acceptance of technology.
Conclusion: This study underscored the critical role of UI design in developing mobile applications for the elderly. It encouraged UI designers to incorporate relevant design elements while developing these applications. Recommendations for developers included ensuring easy navigation, using clear fonts and colors, minimizing content, and incorporating visually intuitive buttons. Moreover, the study highlighted the importance of including emergency contact numbers in m-health applications.

Keywords

References
  1. World Health Organization (WHO). Ageing and Health. WHO; 2022. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/ageing-and-health. Retrieved June 18, 2023.
  2. Bonten TN, Rauwerdink A, Wyatt JC, Kasteleyn MJ, Witkamp L, Riper H, et al. Online guide for electronic health evaluation approaches: systematic scoping review and concept mapping study. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(8):e17774. doi: 10.2196/17774.
  3. Lehnert T, Heider D, Leicht H, Heinrich S, Corrieri S, Luppa M, et al. Review: health care utilization and costs of elderly persons with multiple chronic conditions. Med Care Res Rev. 2011;68(4):387-420. doi: 10.1177/1077558711399580.
  4. Marengoni A, Angleman S, Melis R, Mangialasche F, Karp A, Garmen A, et al. Aging with multimorbidity: a systematic review of the literature. Ageing Res Rev. 2011;10(4):430-9. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2011.03.003.
  5. Picco L, Achilla E, Abdin E, Chong SA, Vaingankar JA, McCrone P, et al. Economic burden of multimorbidity among older adults: impact on healthcare and societal costs. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016;16:173. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1421-7.
  6. Kehler DS. Age-related disease burden as a measure of population ageing. Lancet Public Health. 2019;4(3):e123-4. doi: 10.1016/s2468-2667(19)30026-x.
  7. Sun JK, Smith J. Self-perceptions of aging and perceived barriers to care: reasons for health care delay. Gerontologist. 2017;57(Suppl 2):S216-26. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnx014.
  8. Gardiner FW, Richardson AM, Bishop L, Harwood A, Gardiner E, Gale L, et al. Health care for older people in rural and remote Australia: challenges for service provision. Med J Aust. 2019;211(8):363-4. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50277.
  9. Charness N, Boot WR. Aging and information technology use: potential and barriers. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2009;18(5):253-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01647.x.
  10. Bruder C, Blessing L, Wandke H. Adaptive training interfaces for less-experienced, elderly users of electronic devices. Behav Inf Technol. 2014;33(1):4-15. doi: 10.1080/0144929x.2013.833649.
  11. Fletcher J, Jensen R. Mobile health: barriers to mobile phone use in the aging population. Online J Nurs Inform. 2015;19(3).
  12. Dwivedi YK, Shareef MA, Simintiras AC, Lal B, Weerakkody V. A generalised adoption model for services: a cross-country comparison of mobile health (mHealth). Gov Inf Q. 2016;33(1):174-87. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2015.06.003.
  13. Safdari R, Shams Abadi AR, Pahlevany Nejad S. Improve health of the elderly people with mHealth and technology. Iran J Ageing. 2018;13(3):288-99. doi: 10.32598/sija.13.3.288. [Persian].
  14. Shaw T, McGregor D, Brunner M, Keep M, Janssen A, Barnet S. What is eHealth (6)? Development of a conceptual model for eHealth: qualitative study with key informants. J Med Internet Res. 2017;19(10):e324. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8106.
  15. Nymberg VM, Bolmsjö BB, Wolff M, Calling S, Gerward S, Sandberg M. ‘Having to learn this so late in our lives…’ Swedish elderly patients’ beliefs, experiences, attitudes and expectations of eHealth in primary health care. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2019;37(1):41-52. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2019.1570612.
  16. Holman A, Kruger DJ, Lucas P, Ong K, Bergmans RS, Boehnke KF. Healthcare provider and medical cannabis patient communication regarding referral and medication substitution: the Canadian context. J Cannabis Res. 2022;4(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s42238-022-00141-0.
  17. Birkmeyer S, Wirtz BW, Langer PF. Determinants of mHealth success: an empirical investigation of the user perspective. Int J Inf Manage. 2021;59:102351. doi: 10.1016/j. ijinfomgt.2021.102351.
  18. Lee JH. Future of the smartphone for patients and healthcare providers. Healthc Inform Res. 2016;22(1):1-2. doi: 10.4258/ hir.2016.22.1.1.
  19. Hasan N, Bao Y, Chiong R. A multi-method analytical approach to predicting young adults’ intention to invest in mHealth during the COVID-19 pandemic. Telemat Inform. 2022;68:101765. doi: 10.1016/j.tele.2021.101765.
  20. Mohr DC, Schueller SM, Montague E, Burns MN, Rashidi P. The behavioral intervention technology model: an integrated conceptual and technological framework for eHealth and mHealth interventions. J Med Internet Res. 2014;16(6):e146. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3077.
  21. Guo X, Zhang X, Sun Y. The privacy–personalization paradox in mHealth services acceptance of different age groups. Electron Commer Res Appl. 2016;16:55-65. doi: 10.1016/j. elerap.2015.11.001.
  22. Chib A, van Velthoven MH, Car J. mHealth adoption in low-resource environments: a review of the use of mobile healthcare in developing countries. J Health Commun. 2015;20(1):4-34. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2013.864735.
  23. Beard JR, Bloom DE. Towards a comprehensive public health response to population ageing. Lancet. 2015;385(9968):658- 61. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(14)61461-6.
  24. de la Maisonneuve C, Oliveira Martins J. A Projection Method for Public Health and Long-Term Care Expenditures. 2013. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2291541.
  25. Xie Z, Kalun Or C. Acceptance of mHealth by elderly adults: a path analysis. Proc Hum Factors Ergon Soc Annu Meet. 2020;64(1):755-9. doi: 10.1177/1071181320641174.
  26. Davis FD. A Technology Acceptance Model for Empirically Testing New End-User Information Systems: Theory and Results [dissertation]. Massachusetts Institute of Technology; 1985.
  27. Venkatesh V, Davis FD. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Manag Sci. 2000;46(2):186-204. doi: 10.1287/ mnsc.46.2.186.11926.
  28. van Biljon J, Renaud K. A qualitative study of the applicability of technology acceptance models to senior mobile phone users. In: Advances in Conceptual Modeling – Challenges and Opportunities. 2008; Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2008. p. 228-37. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-87991-6_28.
  29. Ballantyne M, Jha A, Jacobsen A, Hawker JS, El-Glaly YN. Study of accessibility guidelines of mobile applications. In: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia. Association for Computing Machinery; 2018. p. 305-15. doi: 10.1145/3282894.3282921.
  30. Aromataris E, Fernandez R, Godfrey CM, Holly C, Khalil H, Tungpunkom P. Summarizing systematic reviews: methodological development, conduct and reporting of an umbrella review approach. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015;13(3):132-40. doi: 10.1097/xeb.0000000000000055.
  31. Arksey H, O’Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2005;8(1):19-32. doi: 10.1080/1364557032000119616.
  32. Munn Z, Peters MDJ, Stern C, Tufanaru C, McArthur A, Aromataris E. Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018;18(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x.
  33. Kruse CS, Mileski M, Moreno J. Mobile health solutions for the aging population: a systematic narrative analysis. J Telemed Telecare. 2017;23(4):439-51. doi: 10.1177/1357633x16649790.
  34. Kim HS, Lee KH, Kim H, Kim JH. Using mobile phones in healthcare management for the elderly. Maturitas. 2014;79(4):381-8. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2014.08.013.
  35. Sama PR, Eapen ZJ, Weinfurt KP, Shah BR, Schulman KA. An evaluation of mobile health application tools. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2014;2(2):e19. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.3088.
  36. Arnhold M, Quade M, Kirch W. Mobile applications for diabetics: a systematic review and expert-based usability evaluation considering the special requirements of diabetes patients age 50 years or older. J Med Internet Res. 2014;16(4):e104. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2968.
  37. Laakko T, Leppänen J, Lähteenmäki J, Nummiaho A. Mobile health and wellness application framework. Methods Inf Med. 2008;47(3):217-22. doi: 10.3414/me9113.
  38. Zhou L, DeAlmeida D, Parmanto B. Applying a user-centered approach to building a mobile personal health record app: development and usability study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019;7(7):e13194. doi: 10.2196/13194.
  39. Paiva JO, Andrade RM, de Oliveira PA, Duarte P, Santos IS, Evangelista AL, et al. Mobile applications for elderly healthcare: a systematic mapping. PLoS One. 2020;15(7):e0236091. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236091.
  40. Alsswey A, Umar IN, Bervell B. Investigating the acceptance of mobile health application user interface cultural-based design to assist Arab elderly users. Int J Adv Comput Sci Appl. 2018;9(8):144-52.
  41. Handayani PW, Meigasari DA, Pinem AA, Hidayanto AN, Ayuningtyas D. Critical success factors for mobile health implementation in Indonesia. Heliyon. 2018;4(11):e00981. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e00981.
  42. Othman M, Halil NM, Yusof MM, Mohamed R, Abdullah MH. Empowering self-management through mHealth applications. MATEC Web Conf 2018;150:05018. doi: 10.1051/ matecconf/201815005018.
  43. Fletcher J, Jensen R. Overcoming barriers to mobile health technology use in the aging population. Online J Nurs Inform. 2015;19(3).
  44. Charness N, Boot WR. Aging and information technology use: potential and barriers. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2009;18(5):253-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01647.x.
  45. Gjevjon ER, Oderud T, Wensaas GH, Moen A. Toward a typology of technology users: how older people experience technology’s potential for active aging. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2014;201:25-31. doi: 10.3233/978-1-61499-415-2-25.
  46. Hurmuz MZ, Jansen-Kosterink SM, Mork PJ, Bach K, Hermens HJ. What influences the use of an mHealth app among adults with neck and/or low back pain? eHealth-in or out of our daily lives?. 2022:95. Available from: https://www.rrd.nl/ wp-content/uploads/2022/05/54-PhDThesis_MarianHurmuz_ Complete_Website_PDF.pdf#page=95
  47. de Oliveira FS, da Silva CC, Pinheiro TS, Yokoi LM, Dos Santos PD, Tanaka H, et al. Assessment of mHealth solutions applied to fall detection for the elderly. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2021;285:239-44. doi: 10.3233/shti210606.
  48. Isaković M, Sedlar U, Volk M, Bešter J. Usability pitfalls of diabetes mHealth apps for the elderly. J Diabetes Res. 2016;2016:1604609. doi: 10.1155/2016/1604609.
  49. Rayyan. Available from: https://www.rayyan.ai/.
  50. Zhang X, Guo X, Lai KH, Guo F, Li C. Understanding gender differences in mHealth adoption: a modified theory of reasoned action model. Telemed J E Health. 2014;20(1):39- 46. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2013.0092.
  51. Ghazal M, Al Khalil Y, Hajjdiab H. UAV-based remote sensing for vegetation cover estimation using NDVI imagery and level sets method. In: 2015 IEEE International Symposium on Signal Processing and Information Technology (ISSPIT). Abu Dhabi: IEEE; 2015. p. 332-7. doi: 10.1109/isspit.2015.7394354.
  52. Changizi M, Kaveh MH. Effectiveness of the mHealth technology in improvement of healthy behaviors in an elderly population-a systematic review. Mhealth. 2017;3:51. doi: 10.21037/mhealth.2017.08.06.
  53. Dou K, Yu P, Deng N, Liu F, Guan Y, Li Z, et al. Patients’ acceptance of smartphone health technology for chronic disease management: a theoretical model and empirical test. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2017;5(12):e177. doi: 10.2196/ mhealth.7886.
  54. Palacios R, Batista AP, Albuquerque CS, Patiño EG, do Prado Santos J, Conde MT, et al. Efficacy and Safety of a COVID-19 Inactivated Vaccine in Healthcare Professionals in Brazil: The PROFISCOV Study. 2021. Available from: https://ssrn.com/ abstract = 3822780.
  55. Hurmuz MZ, Jansen-Kosterink SM, Beinema T, Fischer K, Op den Akker H, Hermens HJ. Evaluation of a virtual coaching system eHealth intervention: a mixed methods observational cohort study in the Netherlands. Internet Interv. 2022;27:100501. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2022.100501.
  56. Oloveze AO, Ugwu PA, Okonkwo RV, Okeke VC, Chukwuoyims K, Ahaiwe EO. Factors motivating end-users’ behavioural intention to recommend mHealth innovation: multi-group analysis. Health Economics and Management Review. 2022;3(3):17-31. doi: 10.21272/hem.2022.3-02.
  57. Mercer K, Giangregorio L, Schneider E, Chilana P, Li M, Grindrod K. Acceptance of commercially available wearable activity trackers among adults aged over 50 and with chronic illness: a mixed-methods evaluation. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2016;4(1):e7. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.4225.
  58. Hunsaker A, Hargittai E. A review of Internet use among older adults. New Media Soc. 2018;20(10):3937-54. doi: 10.1177/1461444818787348.
  59. Czaja SJ. Can technology empower older adults to manage their health? Generations. 2015;39(1):46-51.
  60. Vroman KG, Arthanat S, Lysack C. “Who over 65 is online?” Older adults’ dispositions toward information communication technology. Comput Human Behav. 2015;43:156-66. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.10.018.
  61. Hill R, Betts LR, Gardner SE. Older adults’ experiences and perceptions of digital technology: (Dis)empowerment, wellbeing, and inclusion. Comput Human Behav. 2015;48:415-23. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.062.
  62. Sun Y, Feng Y, Shen XL, Guo X. Fear appeal, coping appeal and mobile health technology persuasion: a two-stage scenario-based survey of the elderly. Inf Technol People. 2023;36(1):362-86. doi: 10.1108/itp-07-2021-0519.
  63. Pal S, Biswas B, Gupta R, Kumar A, Gupta S. Exploring the factors that affect user experience in mobile-health applications: a text-mining and machine-learning approach. J Bus Res. 2023;156:113484. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113484.
  64. Hayat J, Ramadhan M, Gonnah AR, Alfadhli A, Al-Naseem AO. The role of mobile health technology in perioperative spinal care: a systematic scoping review and narrative synthesis. Cureus. 2024;16(2):e54254. doi: 10.7759/cureus.54254.
  65. Long H. Navigating the Adoption of Mobile Health Technology: Strategies for Seamless Market Integration in Finland [dissertation]. Tampere University of Applied Sciences; 2024.
  66. Mishuris RG, Stewart M, Fix GM, Marcello T, McInnes DK, Hogan TP, et al. Barriers to patient portal access among veterans receiving home-based primary care: a qualitative study. Health Expect. 2015;18(6):2296-305. doi: 10.1111/ hex.12199.
  67. Emergency Handbook. Older Persons. 2018. Available from: https://emergency.unhcr.org/protection/persons-risk/older-persons. Retrieved July 23, 2023.
  68. Pywell J, Vijaykumar S, Dodd A, Coventry L. Barriers to older adults’ uptake of mobile-based mental health interventions. Digit Health. 2020;6:2055207620905422. doi: 10.1177/2055207620905422.
Journal of Qualitative Research in Health Sciences
Volume 14
Pages 1-9
Files
History
  • Receive Date: 23 October 2023
  • Revise Date: 21 April 2025
  • Accept Date: 04 May 2025
Share
How to cite
Statistics