Journal of Qualitative Research in Health Sciences

Journal of Qualitative Research in Health Sciences

Current Issue

By Issue

By Author

By Subject

Author Index

Keyword Index

About Journal

Aims and Scope

Editorial Board

Publication Ethics

Peer Review Process

Editorial Policy

Indexing and Abstracting

Related Links

Journal Metrics

FAQ

News

Guide for Authors

Galley Proof

Policy Responses to the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Qualitative Case Study from Iran

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Health Services Management, School of Public Health, Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran

2 Department of Health Services Management, School of Public Health, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran

3 Physics and Materials Science Research Unit, University of Luxembourg, Luxembourg, Luxembourg

10.34172/jqr.1436

Abstract

Background: The impact of the COVID-19 crisis is highly heterogeneous, with significant implications for crisis management. This study aimed to assess how policies to respond to COVID-19 were formulated, implemented, and evaluated.
Methods: This qualitative, in-depth study was conducted through semi-structured interviews with 31 experts from January to April 2021. The study focused on all relevant stakeholders responsible for the COVID-19 response in Khuzestan Province, Iran. Purposive sampling was employed to select participants, and data collection continued until data saturation was reached. Several related theories, frameworks, and concepts guided the data analysis process. Contextual factors, including structural, economic, situational, cultural, and climatic aspects, were emphasized. Actors were assessed based on their interests and power to influence the COVID-19 response. Kingdon’s multiple streams framework and the Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF) were utilized to analyze the policy process and implementation, respectively. Data were analyzed using content analysis.
Results: The findings provide significant insights into critical measures regarding contextual factors, policy content, and the roles of key actors and processes. Contextual factors played a dual role, acting as both facilitators and inhibitors of policy making against COVID-19. The main measures guiding the policy content in Khuzestan Province included increasing hospital bed capacity, establishing army hospitals, collaborating with private hospitals to utilize 10% of their capacity, repurposing hotel spaces for patients in recovery, leveraging charitable donation volunteers and medical students, deploying health workers on short-term contracts to work in 16-hour COVID-19 centers, conducting specialized training courses for nurses in intensive care units (ICUs), and launching COVID-19 diagnostic laboratories. The results showed that situational factors, governance structures, decision-making processes, and the influence and power of coalitions significantly affected the effectiveness of policy measures.
Conclusion: Investment in infrastructure and fostering integration among different health service providers are fundamental to managing pandemics effectively. Moreover, it is essential to identify understudied aspects of the policy sciences that warrant further attention in the aftermath of the pandemic.

Highlights

Iman Keliddar (PubMed) (Google Scholar)

Keywords

References
  1. World Health Organization (WHO). Available from: https:// covid19.who.int/.
  2. Raoofi A, Takian A, Akbari Sari A, Olyaeemanesh A, Haghighi H, Aarabi M. COVID-19 pandemic and comparative health policy learning in Iran. Arch Iran Med. 2020;23(4):220-34. doi: 10.34172/aim.2020.02.
  3. Zhou Y, Jiang H, Wang Q, Yang M, Chen Y, Jiang Q. Use of contact tracing, isolation, and mass testing to control transmission of COVID-19 in China. BMJ. 2021;375:n2330. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n2330.
  4. Dighe A, Cattarino L, Cuomo-Dannenburg G, Skarp J, Imai N, Bhatia S, et al. Response to COVID-19 in South Korea and implications for lifting stringent interventions. BMC Med. 2020;18(1):321. doi: 10.1186/s12916-020-01791-8.
  5. Abouk R, Heydari B. The immediate effect of COVID-19 policies on social-distancing behavior in the United States. Public Health Rep. 2021;136(2):245-52. doi: 10.1177/0033354920976575.
  6. Taghrir MH, Akbarialiabad H, Ahmadi Marzaleh M. Efficacy of mass quarantine as leverage of health system governance during COVID-19 outbreak: a mini policy review. Arch Iran Med. 2020;23(4):265-7. doi: 10.34172/aim.2020.08 .
  7. Kovač M, Elkanawati A, Gjikolli V, Vandenberghe AS. The COVID-19 pandemic: collective action and European public policy under stress. Cent Eur J Public Policy. 2020;14(2):47- 59. doi: 10.2478/cejpp-2020-0005.
  8. Gabay G, Bellissimo N, Garbi I, Zemel G, Gere A, Moskowitz HR. Driving Public Compliance with the Health Policy of Social Distancing: The case of the COVID-19 Pandemic in India. 2020. Available from: https://ssrn.com/abstract = 3566655.
  9. Adolph C, Amano K, Bang-Jensen B, Fullman N, Wilkerson J. Pandemic politics: timing state-level social distancing responses to COVID-19. J Health Polit Policy Law. 2021;46(2):211-33. doi: 10.1215/03616878-8802162.
  10. Zarei J, Dastoorpoor M, Jamshidnezhad A, Cheraghi M, Sheikhtaheri A. Regional COVID-19 registry in Khuzestan, Iran: a study protocol and lessons learned from a pilot implementation. Inform Med Unlocked. 2021;23:100520. doi: 10.1016/j.imu.2021.100520.
  11. Khalagi K, Gharibzadeh S, Khalili D, Mansournia MA, Mirab Samiee S, Aghamohamadi S, et al. Prevalence of COVID-19 in Iran: results of the first survey of the Iranian COVID-19 serological surveillance programme. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2021;27(11):1666-71. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2021.06.002.
  12. Walt G, Gilson L. Reforming the health sector in developing countries: the central role of policy analysis. Health Policy Plan. 1994;9(4):353-70. doi: 10.1093/heapol/9.4.353.
  13. World Health Organization (WHO). Everybody’s Business-- Strengthening Health Systems to Improve Health Outcomes: WHO’s Framework for Action. WHO; 2007.
  14. Kingdon JW. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. 2nd ed. New York: HarperCollins Publishers; 1995.
  15. Jenkins-Smith HC, Sabatier PA. Evaluating the advocacy coalition framework. J Public Policy. 1994;14(2):175-203. doi: 10.1017/s0143814x00007431.
  16. Yoosefi Lebni J, Abbas J, Moradi F, Salahshoor MR, Chaboksavar F, Irandoost SF, et al. How the COVID-19 pandemic effected economic, social, political, and cultural factors: a lesson from Iran. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2021;67(3):298-300. doi: 10.1177/0020764020939984.
  17. Tantrakarnapa K, Bhopdhornangkul B, Nakhaapakorn K. Influencing factors of COVID-19 spreading: a case study of Thailand. Z Gesundh Wiss. 2022;30(3):621-7. doi: 10.1007/ s10389-020-01329-5.
  18. Messner W, Payson SE. Contextual factors and the COVID-19 outbreak rate across US counties in its initial phase. Health Sci Rep. 2021;4(1):e242. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.242.
  19. Rosario DK, Mutz YS, Bernardes PC, Conte-Junior CA. Relationship between COVID-19 and weather: case study in a tropical country. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2020;229:113587. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2020.113587.
  20. World Health Organization (WHO). WHO Director General’s remarks Launch of Appeal: Global Humanitarian Response Plan - 25 March 2020. WHO; 2020. Available from: https:// www.who.int/director-general/speeches/detail/who-director-general-s-remarks-launch-of-appeal-global-humanitarian-response-plan---25-march-2020.
  21. Sarani A, Seyed Askari SM, Beigzadeh A, Mohammadkhani M, Tavakolisani M, Khanjani N. Iranian nurses’ behavioral changes during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study. J Qual Res Health Sci. 2023;12(4):208-13. doi: 10.34172/ jqr.2023.30.
  22. Kaveh V, Pirjani P, Heydari H, Hosseini Kolbadi KS, Razani G, Sadeqian R, et al. Exploring patients’ and caregivers’ perception of healthcare provision to cancer patients during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study. J Qual Res Health Sci. 2023;12(3):120-8. doi: 10.34172/jqr.2023.18.
  23. Hou C, Chen J, Zhou Y, Hua L, Yuan J, He S, et al. The effectiveness of quarantine of Wuhan city against the Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): A well-mixed SEIR model analysis. J Med Virol. 2020;92(7):841-8. doi: 10.1002/ jmv.25827.
  24. Li D, Liu Z, Liu Q, Gao Z, Zhu J, Yang J, et al. Estimating the efficacy of traffic blockage and quarantine for the epidemic caused by 2019-nCoV (COVID-19). medRxiv [Preprint]. February 18, 2020. Available from: https://www.medrxiv.org/ content/10.1101/2020.02.14.20022913v2.full.
  25. Qiu T, Xiao H. Revealing the influence of national public health policies for the outbreak of the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic in Wuhan, China through status dynamic modeling. medRxiv [Preprint]. March 12, 2020. Available from: https://www. medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.03.10.20032995v1.
  26. Kennelly B, O’Callaghan M, Coughlan D, Cullinan J, Doherty E, Glynn L, et al. The COVID-19 pandemic in Ireland: an overview of the health service and economic policy response. Health Policy Technol. 2020;9(4):419-29. doi: 10.1016/j. hlpt.2020.08.021.
  27. Waitzberg R, Hernández-Quevedo C, Bernal-Delgado E, Estupiñán-Romero F, Angulo-Pueyo E, Theodorou M, et al. Early health system responses to the COVID-19 pandemic in Mediterranean countries: a tale of successes and challenges. Health Policy. 2022;126(5):465-75. doi: 10.1016/j. healthpol.2021.10.007.
  28. Petridou E. Politics and administration in times of crisis: explaining the Swedish response to the COVID‐19 crisis. Eur Policy Anal. 2020;6(2):147-58. doi: 10.1002/epa2.1095.
  29. Cairney P, Wellstead A. COVID-19: effective policymaking depends on trust in experts, politicians, and the public. Policy Des Pract. 2021;4(1):1-14. doi: 10.1080/25741292.2020.1837466.
  30. Baniamin HM, Rahman M, Hasan MT. The COVID-19 pandemic: why are some countries coping more successfully than others? Asia Pac J Public Adm. 2020;42(3):153-69. doi: 10.1080/23276665.2020.1784769.
  31. Hao F, Shao W, Huang W. Understanding the influence of contextual factors and individual social capital on American public mask wearing in response to COVID-19. Health Place. 2021;68:102537. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2021.102537.
  32. Polischuk L, Fay DL. Administrative response to consequences of COVID-19 emergency responses: observations and implications from gender-based violence in Argentina. Am Rev Public Adm. 2020;50(6-7):675-84. doi: 10.1177/0275074020942081.
  33. Khafaie MA, Rahim F. Cross-country comparison of case fatality rates of COVID-19/SARS-COV-2. Osong Public Health Res Perspect. 2020;11(2):74-80. doi: 10.24171/j. phrp.2020.11.2.03.
  34. Shirali GA, Rahimi Z, Araban M, Mohammadi MJ, Cheraghian B. Social-distancing compliance among pedestrians in Ahvaz, South-West Iran during the COVID-19 pandemic. Asian J Soc Health Behav. 2021;4(4):131-6. doi: 10.4103/shb.shb_74_21.
  35. Rudan I. A cascade of causes that led to the COVID-19 tragedy in Italy and in other European Union countries. J Glob Health. 2020;10(1):010335. doi: 10.7189/jogh.10.010335.
  36. Leung K, Wu JT, Liu D, Leung GM. First-wave COVID-19 transmissibility and severity in China outside Hubei after control measures, and second-wave scenario planning: a modelling impact assessment. Lancet. 2020;395(10233):1382- 93. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30746-7.
  37. Altiparmakis A, Bojar A, Brouard S, Foucault M, Kriesi H, Nadeau R. Pandemic politics: policy evaluations of government responses to COVID-19. West European Politics. 2021;44(5- 6):1159-79. doi: 10.1080/01402382.2021.1930754.
  38. Haber N, Clarke-Deelder E, Salomon J, Feller A, Stuart EA. COVID-19 policy impact evaluation: a guide to common design issues. ArXiv [Preprint]. September 3, 2020.Available from: https://arxiv.org/abs/2009.01940.
  39. Lin L, Hou Z. Combat COVID-19 with artificial intelligence and big data. J Travel Med. 2020;27(5):taaa080. doi: 10.1093/ jtm/taaa080.
Journal of Qualitative Research in Health Sciences
Volume 14
Pages 1-13
Files
History
  • Receive Date: 20 May 2024
  • Revise Date: 16 November 2024
  • Accept Date: 23 May 2025
Share
How to cite
Statistics