Journal of Qualitative Research in Health Sciences

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Student Research Committee, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran

2 Department of Medical and Surgical Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Fasa University of Medical Sciences, Fasa, Fars, Iran

3 School of Nursing and Midwifery, Student Research Committee, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran

4 Nursing Research Centre, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran

10.22062/jqrhs.2026.201994.1701

Abstract

Background: Professional competence is essential for nurses to provide safe and effective care. Comparing how this competence is acquired against international standards can reveal strengths and weaknesses in national policies and education. This study used the Walt and Gilson policy triangle model to compare the policies shaping professional competence for clinical nurses in Iran and the United States.
Methods: This study employed a qualitative comparative policy analysis framework. Data were collected through a triangulated approach: (1) a documentary review of relevant literature; (2) analysis of key Iranian national policy documents; and (3) six structured interviews with nurses experienced in both national and international competency examinations to capture practical insights. The Walt and Gilson model (actors, context, content, and process) was used as the framework for data analysis.
Results: Findings are organized around the four dimensions of the policy triangle: Actors: Clinical nurses, students, and faculty members. Context: Factors such as organizational dynamics, educational and evaluation systems, healthcare changes, and the need for cost-effective services. Content: Professional competency includes five domains: care management, scientific competence, individual management, patient-centeredness, and knowledge-seeking. Process: Professional qualification is primarily achieved through a standardized exam in both countries.
Conclusion: Iran's professional competency system is simpler than the U.S. model. Despite both using exams, implementation and incentives differ significantly, reducing nurse motivation in Iran. Reforms should align policies with international standards by improving evaluation methods and linking competency to career advancement.

Keywords

  1. Fukada M. Nursing competency: Definition, structure and development. Yonago acta medica. 2018;61(1):001-7. https://doi.org/10.33160/yam.2018.03.001
  2. Matsutani M, Miura Y, Hirabayashi Y, Sakyo Y, Unoki T, Osumi K, et al. Nursing competency: concept, structure of dimensions, and assessment. 2010;14(2):18-28. abstract.DOI:10.34414/00015090
  3. Organization WH. Global strategic directions for nursing and midwifery 2021-2025: World Health Organization; 2021. Book
  4. Park YI, Kim JA, Ko J-K, Chung MS, Bang K-S, Choe M, et al. An identification study on core nursing competency. The Journal of Korean Academic Society of Nursing Education. 2013;19(4):663-74. https://doi.org/10.5977/jkasne.2013.19.4.663
  5. Halcomb E, Stephens M, Bryce J, Foley E, Ashley C. Nursing competency standards in primary health care: an integrative review. Journal of clinical nursing. 2016;25(9-10):1193-205. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13224
  6. Dunn SV, Lawson D, Robertson S, Underwood M, Clark R, Valentine T, et al. The development of competency standards for specialist critical care nurses. Journal of advanced nursing. 2000;31(2):339-46. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.01292.
  7. Chiarella M, Thoms D, Lau C, McInnes E. An overview of the competency movement in nursing and midwifery. Collegian. 2008;15(2):45-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colegn.2008.02.001
  8. Gardner G, Carryer J, Gardner A, Dunn S. Nurse practitioner competency standards: findings from collaborative Australian and New Zealand research. International journal of nursing studies. 2006;43(5):601-10. 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2005.09.002
  9. Wit RF, de Veer AJ, Batenburg RS, Francke AL. International comparison of professional competency frameworks for nurses: a document analysis. BMC nursing. 2023;22(1):343. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-023-01514-3
  10. Zeydi AE, Ghazanfari MJ, Azizi E, Darvishi-Khezri H, Mortazavi H, Osuji J, et al. Clinical competence of Iranian nurses: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of education and health promotion. 2022;11:102. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_352_21
  11. Gheibizadeh M, & Ashrafizadeh, H., 2020. Different Dimensions of Iranian Nurses’ Competency: A Scoping, Review. Journal of Client-Centered Nursing Care, pp. 239-256. https://doi.org/10.32598/JCCNC.6.4.238.2. 10.32598/JCCNC.6.4.238.2
  12. Zahidie A, Asif S, Iqbal M. Building on the health policy analysis triangle: Elucidation of the elements. Pakistan journal of medical sciences. 2023;39(6):1865. doi: 10.12669/pjms.39.6.7056
  13. Gilson L. Qualitative research synthesis for health policy analysis: what does it entail and what does it offer? Health policy and planning. 2014;29(suppl_3):iii1-iii5. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czu121
  14. O'Brien GL. Using the health policy triangle framework to describe local, regional and national healthcare policy changes within Ireland's diverse healthcare settings. 2020.

https://hdl.handle.net/10468/10885

  1. Araújo Jr JLCd, Maciel Filho R. Developing an operational framework for health policy analysis. Revista Brasileira de Saúde Materno Infantil. 2001;1(3):203-21. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1519-38292001000300002
  2. Saldías Fernández M, Parra-Giordano D. Emergency contraception in Chile: Analysis of public policy according to Walt and Gilson. Medwave; 2025. http://doi.org/10.5867/medwave.2025.10.3139
  3. Walt G, Gilson L. Can frameworks inform knowledge about health policy processes? Reviewing health policy papers on agenda setting and testing them against a specific priority-setting framework. Health policy and planning. 2014;29(suppl_3):iii6-iii22. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czu081
  4. Adib HM, Eshraghi AN. Assessing nurses’ clinical competence from their own viewpoint and the viewpoint of head nurses: A descriptive study. 2018. 10.29252/ijn.31.111.52
  5. Islamic republic of Iran. The sixth five-year economic, social and cultural development plan of the Islamic Republic of Iran (2016-2021). Tehran: Plan and Budget Organization; 2016. Booklet
  6. Najafi B NM, Vagharseyyedin S .Clinical Competence of Nurses: A Systematic Review Study: Quarterly Journal of Nursing Management (IJNV):2022, 1:11. https://sid.ir/paper/1010861/en
  7. Dehghany Z, Abaszadeh A, Moattari M, Bahreini M. Effective reflection on clinical competency of nursing students. 2013. https://sid.ir/paper/23729/en
  8. Nesami M, Rafiee F, Parvizi S, Esmaeili R. Concept analysis of competency in nursing: Qualitative research. Journal of Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences. 2008;18(67):35-42. http://www.mazums.ac.ir/files/onlineJournals_167665=bagheri.pdf
  9. NAJAFI B. NM, Vagharseyyedin s.a.. Clinical Competence of Nurses: A Systematic Review Study. QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF NURSING MANAGEMENT(Internet). 2022;11(1 ):1-9. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/1010861/en.
  10. Pozgar GD. Legal and ethical essentials of health care administration: Jones & Bartlett Learning; 2024. Book
  11. Aaron DG, Robertson CT, King LP, Sage WM. A new legal standard for medical malpractice. Jama. 2025;333(13):1161-5. doi:10.1001/jama.2025.0097
  12. Cline GJ, Rinaldi K, Pryor S, Messer M. Preparing nurse educator students for the new National Council of State Boards of Nursing NCLEX and AACN Essentials. Journal of Nursing Education. 2024;63(3):192-6. https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20231128-01
  13. Meyer G, Moran V, Cuvar K, Carlson JH. State boards of nursing and the bridge to quality. Journal of Nursing Education. 2014;53(7):379-86. https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20140617-03
  14. Ravani Pour M, Vanaki Z, Afsar L, Azemian A. The standards of professionalism in nursing: the nursing instructors’ experiences. Evidence Based Care. 2014; 4(1):27-40. 10.22038/ebcj.2014.2392
  15. Seidi J, Fotohi P, Rahimi S, Salawati Ghasemi S, Azadnia A. Investigating Factors Affecting on Quality of Clinical Education and its Related Factors in Nursing and Midwifery students in Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences. Journal of Nursing Education. 2023 May 10;12(2):58-65.10.22034/JNE.12.2.58
  16. https://sanjeshp.ir/.
  17. Twidwell JE, Records K. An integrative review on standardized exams as a predictive admission criterion for RN programs. International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship. 2017;14(1):20160040. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijnes-2016-0040
  18. Quinn BL, Smolinski M, Peters AB. Strategies to improve NCLEX-RN success: A review. Teaching and Learning in Nursing. 2018;13(1):18-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teln.2017.09.002
  19. Smith L, Roberts KJ, Giambra B, Polfuss M, Danford C, Sheppard‐Lemoine D, et al. Nurses’ engagement in healthcare policy development: An umbrella review. International nursing review. 2025;72(4):e70109. https://doi.org/10.1111/inr.70109
  20. Miri K, Bahrami M, Sabeghi H, Mazlom SR. Assessing the Necessity of Final Exam at the End of the Undergraduate Nursing Course from the Point of View of Faculty Members and Students of Mashhad and Torbat Heydariyeh in 2016: A Short Report. Journal of Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences. 2018;17(6):587-94. https://sid.ir/paper/71084/en